2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural networks related to pro-saccades and anti-saccades revealed by independent component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(138 reference statements)
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less commonly observed is the temporo-parietal network involving bilateral inferior temporal gyri and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The executive control network usually includes the bilateral prefrontal cortex and the core regions (Smith et al 2009;Domagalik et al 2012). Here, the executive control and prefrontal networks were separated.…”
Section: Fmri Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Less commonly observed is the temporo-parietal network involving bilateral inferior temporal gyri and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The executive control network usually includes the bilateral prefrontal cortex and the core regions (Smith et al 2009;Domagalik et al 2012). Here, the executive control and prefrontal networks were separated.…”
Section: Fmri Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left and right frontoparietal and the auditory networks are highly reproducible, as indicated by all the referenced studies. Lastly, the network comprising the precuneus (Domagalik et al 2012) is less often observed. Only the temporo-parietal network achieved the established criteria of significant interaction [ …”
Section: Fmri Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its unique capacity of separating signal mixture from each voxel into source signals, investigators have used sICA to de-noise fMRI data by separating artifacts from signals (Aron and Poldrack, 2006; Beckmann, 2012; Brooks et al, 2013; Du et al, 2016; Griffanti et al, 2014; Tohka et al, 2008; Yakunina et al, 2013). Furthermore, some fMRI sICA studies have described spatial overlap of two or more FNs, indicating that sICA can separate BOLD signal mixtures from individual voxels into two or more FNs in the overlapping regions (Calhoun et al, 2008; Domagalik et al, 2012; Kim et al, 2009a; Kim et al, 2009b; Menz et al, 2009; St Jacques et al, 2011; van Wageningen et al, 2009; Wu et al, 2009; Zhang and Li, 2012). Very recently, we and at least three other groups systematically described FN overlap generated by sICA (Beldzik et al, 2013; Braga et al, 2013; Geranmayeh et al, 2014; Leech et al, 2012; Xu et al, 2014a; Xu et al, 2013a; Xu et al, 2013b; Yeo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, both GLM and sICA were used to interrogate fMRI data acquired during pro-saccadic (PS) and anti-saccadic (AS) tasks (Beldzik et al, 2013; Domagalik et al, 2012). sICA extracted 11 FNs which showed extensive overlap at multiple brain regions including the intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye field, precuneus and posterior cingulate (PCC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a saccade directed in opposite direction of the required landing point) occur very infrequently in prosaccade trials (Ettinger et al, 2003(Ettinger et al, , 2005Smyrnis et al, 2002;Tatler and Hutton, 2007). Furthermore, the spatial goal of the saccade is not directly mapped on the sensory stimulus but has to be computed by inverting the initial stimulus vector by 180°, making the required stimulus response mapping spatially more complex than in standard prosaccades (Domagalik et al, 2012;Munoz and Everling, 2004). Due to these sensorimotor and inhibitory demands antisaccades are associated with longer reaction times, decreased spatial accuracy, and a greater recruitment of a dorsal fronto-parietal network including the PPC and the frontal and supplementary eye fields (FEF, SEF) than simple prosaccades (Bedi et al, 2013;Brown et al, 2006;Domagalik et al, 2012;Ettinger et al, 2003Ettinger et al, , 2005Ettinger et al, , 2008Smyrnis et al, 2002;Tatler and Hutton, 2007; for a review see: McDowell et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%