2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Perspectives on Cognitive Control Development during Childhood and Adolescence

Abstract: Since the discovery that patients with damage to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) show similar deficits in cognitive control as young children, the PFC model of cognitive control development has been a popular description of how cognitive control emerges over time. In this review, we show that not only do many studies support this model, but also that more specific models of PFC development can be formulated, according to the functional roles of subregions and by taking into account the distinctions within ventral-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
157
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(117 reference statements)
10
157
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the PFC, there are a number of subregions that are delineated based on anatomical connections and granular structure (Barbas & García-Cabezas, 2016). These include the orbitofrontal PFC, ventrolateral PFC, dorsolateral PFC, rostrolateral, and medial PFC (Badre & D’Esposito, 2007, 2009; Bunge & Zelazo, 2006; Crone & Steinbeis, 2017; Koechlin, 2016). …”
Section: Pfc: the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the PFC, there are a number of subregions that are delineated based on anatomical connections and granular structure (Barbas & García-Cabezas, 2016). These include the orbitofrontal PFC, ventrolateral PFC, dorsolateral PFC, rostrolateral, and medial PFC (Badre & D’Esposito, 2007, 2009; Bunge & Zelazo, 2006; Crone & Steinbeis, 2017; Koechlin, 2016). …”
Section: Pfc: the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, from this point of view, the higher striatal activation in good versus poor gaming might suggest a role for this brain region in better response selection and sensory coordination, although additional research is needed to investigate this possibility. During good versus poor gaming, the striatum was found to be more strongly functionally connected with brain regions previously implicated in executive control (middle frontal gyrus), motor control (precentral gyrus), and decision‐making (inferior frontal gyrus) (Brown, 2011; Crone & Steinbeis, 2017; Gourley & Taylor, 2016; Posner & Rothbart, 1998). Based on the current literature on the role of the striatum in gaming, multiple explanations are possible, including both proposed by Koepp et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, during good‐play trials, the prefrontal gyrus was functionally connected with the middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting important roles for these regions during good gaming. The middle frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex have been implicated in executive control; for example, individuals with frontal lesions exhibit problems with goal‐directed behaviors, especially in novel tasks involving control processing (Brown, 2011; Crone & Steinbeis, 2017; Gourley & Taylor, 2016; Posner & Rothbart, 1998). The inferior frontal gyrus has been implicated in decision‐making (Jimura, Chushak, Westbrook, & Braver, 2017; Wang et al., 2016) and inhibitory control (Bari & Robbins, 2013; Shao, Zhang, & Lee, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it has also been suggested that age‐related changes are evident more in the temporal dynamics of brain region recruitment, rather than in the magnitude or location of that recruitment (Wendelken, Munakata, Baym, Souza, & Bunge, 2012). Given these diverse results, defining what constitutes “mature or adult brain activity” during cognitive processing is difficult and cannot simply be defined in terms of the amount of activity in a specific region (Crone & Steinbeis, 2017; Somerville, 2016). An adolescent may, for example, utilize a different cognitive strategy than an adult to accomplish a task, and thus also recruit different neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%