2014
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2014.971414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Predictors of Message Effectiveness during Counterarguing in Antidrug Campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20). By contrast, the perceived effectiveness of messaging at scale is associated within the middle frontal and superior temporal gyri, 54 further emphasizing that the antecedents of self-report outcomes may differ from those of behavioral outcomes. Activity in this same value system that is associated with health behavior change also plays a central role in people's decisions to share health information with others.…”
Section: Persuasive Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20). By contrast, the perceived effectiveness of messaging at scale is associated within the middle frontal and superior temporal gyri, 54 further emphasizing that the antecedents of self-report outcomes may differ from those of behavioral outcomes. Activity in this same value system that is associated with health behavior change also plays a central role in people's decisions to share health information with others.…”
Section: Persuasive Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Later, when providing a second set of ratings about the same foods, foods earlier rated more highly by peers elicited greater activity in the value system within the vmPFC. 45 Activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) [48][49][50][51][52] and other brain responses 53,54 also predict the effectiveness of persuasive health messages encouraging behavior change. For example, brain activity in the mPFC in response to messages encouraging people to quit smoking, 48,55,56 wear more sunscreen, 51,57 and get more physical exercise 49 has been associated with message-consistent behavior change.…”
Section: Persuasive Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related, although both positive and negative emotionally‐evocative messages are known to impact decision‐making (Gallagher & Updegraff, ; Rothman & Salovey, ), future work could ask how positive versus negative appeals differ in their malleability to cognitive regulation, or their tendencies to elicit specific kinds of cognitive regulation processes. For example, perhaps persuasive benefits of negatively valenced appeals may be undercut by counter‐arguing processes they tend to evoke, but these counter‐arguing tendencies could be mitigated with other kinds of interventions that promote specific kinds of cognition (Kang et al, ; Weber, Huskey, Mangus, Westcott‐Baker, & Turner, ). Moreover, future work could ask whether specific populations (e.g., people with substance use disorders) show differences in bottom‐up reactivity versus top‐down regulation tendencies toward relevant and potentially‐threatening health messages, and whether targeted cognitive or motivational interventions are able to normalize these responses (Falk et al, ; Kang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also constitutes a new step in the neuromarketing field with the application of neurological tools aiming to explore consumer processing of visual and audio information. Previous research in this direction employed fMRI to compare the neural processing of successful and unsuccessful advertising (Daugherty, Hoffman, & Kennedy, 2016), to test the effect of counterarguing in antidrug campaigns (Weber, Huskey, Mangus, Westcott-Baker, & Turner, 2015), to explore advertising appeals and their relationship to product attractiveness (Chang, O'Boyle, Anderson, & Suttikun, 2016) or to elucidate the neural mechanisms of social influence (Mason, Dyer, & Norton, 2009). This study advances and spells out the processing of the combination of two elements, voice gender and gender product, whose subconscious mechanisms were previously not investigated in advertising research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%