2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural substrates of emotional interference: A quantitative EEG study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were reported, in an earlier study by Zhu, Zhang, Wu, Luo, and Luo [58] who found that when participants respond to words and ignore faces, the incongruent condition evokes a less negative N170 component (i.e., a marker of face encoding) than the congruent condition. Moreover, when participants respond to emotional faces while ignoring emotional words (and vice versa, they respond to words and ignore faces), EEG evidence shows that trials with affectively incongruent target and distractor are associated with a disengagement of fronto-parietal attentional network [59]. Finally, recent evidence from an fMRI study using the word-face interference task with adolescents provides additional insight on the involvement of the fronto-parietal network in emotional conflict elicited by emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar findings were reported, in an earlier study by Zhu, Zhang, Wu, Luo, and Luo [58] who found that when participants respond to words and ignore faces, the incongruent condition evokes a less negative N170 component (i.e., a marker of face encoding) than the congruent condition. Moreover, when participants respond to emotional faces while ignoring emotional words (and vice versa, they respond to words and ignore faces), EEG evidence shows that trials with affectively incongruent target and distractor are associated with a disengagement of fronto-parietal attentional network [59]. Finally, recent evidence from an fMRI study using the word-face interference task with adolescents provides additional insight on the involvement of the fronto-parietal network in emotional conflict elicited by emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this study, the database of facial emotion images (POFA) 15 , which includes 110 black and white images of facial expressions, was used as emotional stimuli. The brain areas involved during emotional interference conditions have been investigated in 16 . The brain source activities were computed using sLORETA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brain source activities were computed using sLORETA. Considerable decreased activity [p < 0.05/66] with respect to baseline are observed in Eighteen gyri in face-word interference and fifty-four gyri in word-face interference, respectively 16 . To detect EEG emotions, a dynamic convolutional neural network (DGCNN) is presented in 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some deep neural networks applied to electroencephalography data claim greater than 90% accuracy in terms of predicting mental health symptoms [15][16][17]. Also, traditionally, several studies relate EEG neural markers to cognitive functions, such as attention [18][19][20], inhibitory control [21][22][23], emotion processing [18,24], working memory, and cognitive load [25][26][27][28]. Yet, specific mental health symptoms have not been predicted from the standpoint of multiple neural markers underlying essential cognitive processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%