2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-13190104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Tube Defect: Epidemiologic and Demographic Implication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anencephalic newborns are rarely live births. Spina bifida was mostly identified in the lumbar region in our study, which is comparable with the report in India, suggesting that the lumbar region is most prone to spina bifida [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Anencephalic newborns are rarely live births. Spina bifida was mostly identified in the lumbar region in our study, which is comparable with the report in India, suggesting that the lumbar region is most prone to spina bifida [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Birth defects are major causes of mortalities before five years of age and Neural tube defects (NTDs) are one of the most common major birth defects next to congenital heart diseases [ 11 ]. In this study, the total prevalence for all types of NTDs was found to be 10.9 per 1000 pregnancies, which is six times more prevalent than the study done in six countries by World Health Organization (WHO) 1.67/1000 [ 5 ], and three times more prevalent than a study done in Sudan 3.48/1000 [ 12 ], and 1.8 times more prevalent than a study done in three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa 6.1/1000 [ 13 ]. But this prevalence was less than the prevalence of NTDs in Tigray region 13.8/1000 [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Despite that birth defects are major cause of mortalities before ve years of age and neural tube defects (NTDs) are one of the most common major birth defects next to congenital heart diseases, adequate surveillance data are needed to develop effective prevention strategies (16). This study revealed that maternal age, < 20 (OR = 3.09, CI = 0.95-10.08, p = 0.046), maternal age 31-35 (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.16-1.7, p = 0.028) were strongly associated to risk of NTDs, but it had age differences study done in Genoa showed that maternal age < 25 years (OR = 3.36) and > 35 years; (OR = 5.21) Italy(17) and Tigray region > 35 years (OR = 2.5, p = 0.0004)(4). Possible correlation can be established between pregnancy at lower age groups < 20 and NTDs risks, this might be due to low socioeconomic status, low educational level, lack of knowledge regarding potential risk factors and preventive measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%