2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2004.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuraminidase produces dose-dependent decrease of slime production and adherence of slime-forming, coagulase-negative staphylococci

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data suggested involvement of protein components in adherence to polystyrene, but not in autoaggregation properties and adherence to glass surfaces. Previous studies also gave an insight into the mechanism of slime production and adherence of slime-forming CoNS to polystyrene plates and polypropylene tubes (Sakarya et al, 2004). Biofilm formation and adherence to acrylic by S. haemolyticus were found significantly reduced compared to those of S. epidermidis (Cerca et al, 2004(Cerca et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data suggested involvement of protein components in adherence to polystyrene, but not in autoaggregation properties and adherence to glass surfaces. Previous studies also gave an insight into the mechanism of slime production and adherence of slime-forming CoNS to polystyrene plates and polypropylene tubes (Sakarya et al, 2004). Biofilm formation and adherence to acrylic by S. haemolyticus were found significantly reduced compared to those of S. epidermidis (Cerca et al, 2004(Cerca et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other materials such as polypropylene, polystyrene, vinyl (PVC), silicon, Teflon, and silicone tend to collect electrons and become negatively charged. Sialic acid may be a constituent molecule of slime and involved in bacterial adherence to inert surfaces, as demonstrated for Corynebacterium diphtheriae (Mattos-Guaraldi et al, 1999) and CoNS (Sakarya et al, 2004). Krepsky et al (2003) investigated cell surface hydrophobicity and slime production of S. epidermidis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference seen in our study may result from in vitro circumstances. The ability of S. aureus to form a biofilm, sialic acid-forming slime, bacterial enzymes increasing adhesion, the molecular properties of the bacteria, and the graft all play important roles in adhesion [14,18,29], but we do not know which effects are greater in vitro or in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virulence of S. aureus and E. coli depends on the patient's tissue, structural and molecular properties of the prostheses, secretory products, and the surface properties of the bacteria [14][15][16]. Several studies have examined the in vivo and in vitro interactions between prostheses and bacteria [15,17,18].…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%