2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuraxial and general anaesthesia for caesarean section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Moreover, in the case of women experiencing pain under neuraxial anesthesia, converting to general anesthesia is acceptable, especially in prolonged surgeries. 23 This finding provides an explanation for the observed association between general anesthesia and prolonged CD time.…”
Section: Our Findings In the Context Of Other Observationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Moreover, in the case of women experiencing pain under neuraxial anesthesia, converting to general anesthesia is acceptable, especially in prolonged surgeries. 23 This finding provides an explanation for the observed association between general anesthesia and prolonged CD time.…”
Section: Our Findings In the Context Of Other Observationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…General anesthesia is virtually exclusively used in emergency situations or when neuraxial anesthesia techniques have failed or are contraindicated 22 . Moreover, in the case of women experiencing pain under neuraxial anesthesia, converting to general anesthesia is acceptable, especially in prolonged surgeries 23 . This finding provides an explanation for the observed association between general anesthesia and prolonged CD time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe and occasionally life-threatening complications related to neuraxial anaesthesia (subdural hematoma [38], meningitis, permanent neurological damage, chemical arachnoiditis [39]) are so rare in the obstetric cohort that they are difficult to assess, with permanent neurologic complications estimated between 0.3 and 1.2 per 100.000 [40]. Because of its reliability and safety profile, neuraxial anaesthesia is considered the technique of choice in conducting elective CS [41], because it appears safer for the mother (not exposed to general anaesthesia-associated risks, mainly difficult airway management and pulmonary aspiration) and the newborn [42]. General anaesthesia is ultimately reserved when neuraxial anaesthesia is contraindicated or for Category 1 CS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cesarean sections, neuraxial anesthesia is preferred over general anesthesia; however, general anesthesia is still administered under some conditions [ 28 ]. Because pregnancy-related physiological changes peak at term and delivery, the efficacy and safety profiles are of primary concern when using sugammadex after fetus delivery.…”
Section: Clinical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%