Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3404835.3462826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legal Judgement Prediction: LJP/COC as an NLP task has been studied using corpora from different jurisdictions, such as the ECtHR (Chalkidis et al, 2019(Chalkidis et al, , 2021(Chalkidis et al, , 2022bAletras et al, 2016;Liu and Chen, 2017;Medvedeva et al, 2020;SAYS, 2020;Medvedeva et al, 2021;Santosh et al, 2023) Chinese Criminal Courts (Luo et al, 2017;Zhong et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019;Yue et al, 2021;Zhong et al, 2020), US Supreme Court (Katz et al, 2017;Kaufman et al, 2019), Indian Supreme Court (Malik et al, 2021;Shaikh et al, 2020) the French court of Cassation ( Şulea et al, 2017b,a), Brazilian courts (Lage-Freitas et al, 2022), the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland (Niklaus et al, 2021), UK courts (Strickson and De La Iglesia, 2020) and German courts (Waltl et al, 2017) Early works (Aletras et al, 2016;Şulea et al, 2017a,b;Virtucio et al, 2018;Shaikh et al, 2020;Medvedeva et al, 2020) used bag-of-words features. More recent approaches use deep learning (Zhong et al, 2018(Zhong et al, , 2020Yang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Legal Judgement Prediction: LJP/COC as an NLP task has been studied using corpora from different jurisdictions, such as the ECtHR (Chalkidis et al, 2019(Chalkidis et al, , 2021(Chalkidis et al, , 2022bAletras et al, 2016;Liu and Chen, 2017;Medvedeva et al, 2020;SAYS, 2020;Medvedeva et al, 2021;Santosh et al, 2023) Chinese Criminal Courts (Luo et al, 2017;Zhong et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2019;Yue et al, 2021;Zhong et al, 2020), US Supreme Court (Katz et al, 2017;Kaufman et al, 2019), Indian Supreme Court (Malik et al, 2021;Shaikh et al, 2020) the French court of Cassation ( Şulea et al, 2017b,a), Brazilian courts (Lage-Freitas et al, 2022), the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland (Niklaus et al, 2021), UK courts (Strickson and De La Iglesia, 2020) and German courts (Waltl et al, 2017) Early works (Aletras et al, 2016;Şulea et al, 2017a,b;Virtucio et al, 2018;Shaikh et al, 2020;Medvedeva et al, 2020) used bag-of-words features. More recent approaches use deep learning (Zhong et al, 2018(Zhong et al, , 2020Yang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo et al 2017 used an attention-based neural network which jointly models charge prediction and relevant article extraction in a unified framework whose input includes the text of legal articles. Sim-ilarly, Wang et al , 2019bChen et al 2022;Yue et al 2021 employ matching mechanism between case facts and article texts. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to adapt articleaware prediction to the ECtHR corpus, which is situated in the in human rights litigation domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Legal judgment prediction (LJP) aims to predict judgment results based on the fact descriptions automatically (Lin et al, 2012;Chalkidis et al, 2019;Yue et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2020;Niklaus et al, 2021;Malik et al, 2021;Lyu et al, 2022;Gan et al, 2022). The LJP methods in earlier years required manually extracted features (Keown, 1980), which is simple but costly.…”
Section: Legal Judgment Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the previous LJP works (Zhong et al, 2018;Yue et al, 2021;Dong and Niu, 2021), our experiments are conducted on the publicly available real-world legal dataset. To prevent any potential data leakage during the training of the LLMs, where the model may have already encountered the test cases, we create a new test set comprising cases that occurred after 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%