2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-evolutionary approach for optimal selection of EEG channels in motor imagery based BCI application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the proper cognitive experimental design, researchers have introduced deep learning algorithms that can predict future brain states from pre-event sensory data. In Idowu et al (2021), the authors introduced an LSTM-SAE model to predict the future motor intention of users undergoing visual stimuli. However, neuroscience problems are inherently multimodal, relying on unimodal information could skew results (Abrol et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the proper cognitive experimental design, researchers have introduced deep learning algorithms that can predict future brain states from pre-event sensory data. In Idowu et al (2021), the authors introduced an LSTM-SAE model to predict the future motor intention of users undergoing visual stimuli. However, neuroscience problems are inherently multimodal, relying on unimodal information could skew results (Abrol et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG channel selection algorithm (e.g., XCDC, Neuroevolutionary approach, automatic channel selection, and squeeze and excitation blocks (ACS-SE)) is a solid baseline when combined with deep neural networks (e.g., CNN, multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN), etc.) classifier [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. When comparing many EEG channel selection algorithms with various classifiers, it was discovered that DNN and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers produce the best results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing many EEG channel selection algorithms with various classifiers, it was discovered that DNN and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers produce the best results. As a result, recent contributions have focused on developing ensemble approaches that outperform various EEG channel selection algorithms combined with DNNs and SVM [ 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 ]. These methods employ a combination of spatial filters, correlation-based, sequential-based, and binary harmony search-based EEG channel selection, and various classifiers (e.g., CNN [ 24 ], MLP-NN [ 22 ], SVM [ 19 ], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [ 26 ] on one or more BCI competition datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a standard paradigm in brain-computer interfaces [7], MI has rapidly developed in recent years. Underlying this rapid development is the ability of MI to trigger contralateral explicit event-related desynchronization (ERD) and, in some cases, simultaneous ipsilateral event-related synchronization (ERS) by unilateral imaging movements [8] For instance, when picturing unilateral hand movements, the energy of mu rhythms (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and beta rhythms (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) in the contralateral brain region is decreased (ERD), whereas the energy of mu rhythms and beta rhythms in the ipsilateral motor-sensory areas is increased (ERS) [9]. The spontaneity and classifiability of MI make it a critical factor in ensuring the availability and smoothness (the efficiency of information transmission) of the machine subsystem in BCI systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spontaneity and classifiability of MI make it a critical factor in ensuring the availability and smoothness (the efficiency of information transmission) of the machine subsystem in BCI systems. Much of the current research on motion imagery has focused on the separability of MI, enhancing accuracy by examining feature extraction [10], channel selection [11], and classification methods [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%