2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2011.00795.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro‐invasion by a ‘Trojan Horse’ strategy and vasculopathy during intrauterine flavivirus infection

Abstract: The central nervous system (CNS) is a major target of several important human and animal viral pathogens causing congenital infections. However, despite the importance of neuropathological outcomes, for humans in particular, the pathogenesis, including mode of neuro-invasion, remains unresolved for most congenital virus infections. Using a natural model of congenital infection with an RNA virus, bovine viral diarrhoea virus in pregnant cattle, we sought to delineate the timing and mode of virus neuro-invasion … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subphyseal and proximal zones were not analyzed for dynamic parameters due to the complete lack of labeling and predominance of diffuse labeling, respectively. The definition of the parameters evaluated, their corresponding referents, standardized nomenclature, units of measurement, and criteria for evaluation, where applicable, are listed as follows: bone volume-trabecular bone volume including calcified cartilage cores normalized to tissue volume (BV/TV, %); cartilage volume-longitudinal calcified cartilage core volume normalized to bone volume (Cg.V/BV, %); total bone surface (BS, mm 2 ); number of osteoclasts (TRAP positive) per mm 2 bone surface (N.Oc/BS, #/mm 2 ); osteoclast surface-TRAP-positive osteoclast-covered bone surface normalized to bone surface (Oc.S/BS, %); single-labeled surface-area of bone surface with a single flurochrome label normalized to bone surface (s.LS/BS, %); double-labeled surface-area of bone surface with 2 labels normalized to bone surface (d.LS/BS, %); mineralizing surface-equal to half the area of single-labeled surface plus the area of double-labeled surface normalized to bone surface (MS/BS, %); mineral apposition rate-average distance between first and second label divided by the number of days in the interlabel period (MAR, mm/day); and bone formation rate-equal to the mineralizing surface normalized to bone surface multiplied by the mineral apposition rate (MS/BS * MAR, mm 3 /mm 2 /day). Femoral middiaphyseal apposition rates were determined by averaging the width of nonlabeled subperiosteal plexiform bone at 5 standardized sites and dividing this distance by the period (7 days) between administration of the second label and collection.…”
Section: Histomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subphyseal and proximal zones were not analyzed for dynamic parameters due to the complete lack of labeling and predominance of diffuse labeling, respectively. The definition of the parameters evaluated, their corresponding referents, standardized nomenclature, units of measurement, and criteria for evaluation, where applicable, are listed as follows: bone volume-trabecular bone volume including calcified cartilage cores normalized to tissue volume (BV/TV, %); cartilage volume-longitudinal calcified cartilage core volume normalized to bone volume (Cg.V/BV, %); total bone surface (BS, mm 2 ); number of osteoclasts (TRAP positive) per mm 2 bone surface (N.Oc/BS, #/mm 2 ); osteoclast surface-TRAP-positive osteoclast-covered bone surface normalized to bone surface (Oc.S/BS, %); single-labeled surface-area of bone surface with a single flurochrome label normalized to bone surface (s.LS/BS, %); double-labeled surface-area of bone surface with 2 labels normalized to bone surface (d.LS/BS, %); mineralizing surface-equal to half the area of single-labeled surface plus the area of double-labeled surface normalized to bone surface (MS/BS, %); mineral apposition rate-average distance between first and second label divided by the number of days in the interlabel period (MAR, mm/day); and bone formation rate-equal to the mineralizing surface normalized to bone surface multiplied by the mineral apposition rate (MS/BS * MAR, mm 3 /mm 2 /day). Femoral middiaphyseal apposition rates were determined by averaging the width of nonlabeled subperiosteal plexiform bone at 5 standardized sites and dividing this distance by the period (7 days) between administration of the second label and collection.…”
Section: Histomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabbit anti-GFAP (Dako) and goat anti-Iba1 (Abcam) antibodies were used to assess astrocytic and microglial activation in brain and spinal cord sections, using a previously described protocol (Miura et al, 2008). The degree of viral antigen load and glial cell activation was scored semiquantitatively as described previously (Bielefeldt-Ohmann et al, 2012;Tolnay et al, 2010) by an observer (H. B.-O.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the function and trafficking behaviour of WNV infected leucocytes have not been examined, as noted by King et al [71] and Bielefeldt-Ohmann et al [72].…”
Section: Via a "Trojan Horse" Mode Of Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of viral antigen load and glial cell activation was scored semi-quantitatively as previously described [72,256] …”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation