2006
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2402-05.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroanatomical Dissociation of Encoding Processes Related to Priming and Explicit Memory

Abstract: Priming is a facilitation of cognitive processing with stimulus repetition that can occur without explicit memory. Whereas the functional neuroanatomy of perceptual priming at retrieval is established, encoding processes that initiate priming and explicit memory have not yet been anatomically separated, and we investigated them using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Activations predicting later explicit memory occurred in the bilateral medial temporal lobe (MTL) and left prefrontal cortex (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

13
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
13
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The priming Dm, right lateralized from ϳ200 -500 ms and bilateral from ϳ600 -900 ms, is consistent with a priming Dm found with fMRI, which included activity increases in parietal cortex especially on the right (Schott et al, 2006). Collectively, our results suggest that greater perceptual learning on the first encounter with a novel item (positive priming Dm) produces a memory representation that enables more fluent processing of the same item in a subsequent encounter (negative old/new effect).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The priming Dm, right lateralized from ϳ200 -500 ms and bilateral from ϳ600 -900 ms, is consistent with a priming Dm found with fMRI, which included activity increases in parietal cortex especially on the right (Schott et al, 2006). Collectively, our results suggest that greater perceptual learning on the first encounter with a novel item (positive priming Dm) produces a memory representation that enables more fluent processing of the same item in a subsequent encounter (negative old/new effect).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The negative ERP effects attributed to priming were occipital in focus and onset rapidly, thus appearing as negative modulations of early, object-sensitive ERP components related to activity in object-sensitive visual cortex measured with fMRI (Schendan and Lucia, 2010). Furthermore, occipital-negative ERP effects similar to those reported here have been identified in conditions that also produce reductions in object-sensitive visual cortex activity measured with fMRI (Schott et al, 2002(Schott et al, , 2006. The available evidence thus fits well with the interpretation of priming-related negative ERP effects reported here as signals of reduced cortical activity, but direct evidence for this proposal should be provided by other means in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent observations that perception of a stimulus can be influenced by prestimulus brain activity (10,11) raise the additional possibility that the brain state immediately preceding an event could predict later episodic memory. This possibility is supported by findings in rodents that the amplitude of hippocampal theta (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8) oscillations, which are held to be important modulators of the induction of synaptic plasticity (12)(13)(14), is associated with enhanced learning in classical conditioning even before stimulus onset (15)(16)(17). Because the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and, in particular, the hippocampus are also critical for episodic memory encoding in humans (18)(19)(20), prestimulus mediotemporal theta states might be linked to effective episodic memory encoding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Repetition of familiar material usually entails a decrease in neuronal activity, referred to as repetition suppression, which may rely on a sharpened representation composed of neurons that code only key stimulus features (Desimone, 1996;Wiggs and Martin, 1998;Grill-Spector et al, 2006). Repetition suppression has been found in various visual areas (for review, see Schacter et al, 2004) coding written words (Schott et al, 2006), faces (Eger et al, 2005), objects (Vuilleumier et al, 2002) or line drawings (Lebreton et al, 2001). Repetition of unfamiliar material, however, sometimes leads to an increase in cortical activity (Schacter et al, 1995a;Habeck et al, 2006), referred to as repetition enhancement, which may reflect the formation of new cell assemblies (Henson, 2000;Fiebach et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%