1987
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520140058018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobehavioral Outcome After Closed Head Injury in Childhood and Adolescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to other many studies that have examined predictors of outcome in older children after TBI, in which it was found that younger children have a poorer outcome. 33,34 One other study recently found age not to be predictive of outcome in young children, and here the authors comment that their findings are "contrary to expectations." 35 A larger study is required to confirm our findings that age does not seem to influence outcome within the subpopulation of inflicted TBI.…”
Section: E182mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This is contrary to other many studies that have examined predictors of outcome in older children after TBI, in which it was found that younger children have a poorer outcome. 33,34 One other study recently found age not to be predictive of outcome in young children, and here the authors comment that their findings are "contrary to expectations." 35 A larger study is required to confirm our findings that age does not seem to influence outcome within the subpopulation of inflicted TBI.…”
Section: E182mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although some studies examining functional/neurobehavioral outcome in age-based cohorts of children and adolescents following nonpenetrating brain injury did not identify relationships with age [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], the majority of studies report less favorable rates of mortality and morbidity in infants and preschoolers than in school-age children and adolescents [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing injury severity as reflected in lower GCS scores and increasing duration of impaired consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia is generally associated with decreasing functional competence at the time of discharge [24]as well as 6 months to several years after injury in pediatric populations [6, 13, 25]. Both the total GCS score and the component scores have been significantly related to outcome during early [5]and late stages of recovery [25, 26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GOS was used as the endpoint of evaluation because GOS levels of 3–5 have correlated with detailed neuropsychological evaluation years after injury [28, 29]. Outcome at discharge was considered adequate to identify patients with unfavourable outcome in the light of the report by Filley et al [29]that no child with coma lasting more than 1 month or in persistent vegetative state improved to good outcome by any criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome at discharge was considered adequate to identify patients with unfavourable outcome in the light of the report by Filley et al [29]that no child with coma lasting more than 1 month or in persistent vegetative state improved to good outcome by any criteria. Children with severe disability were included in the favourable outcome group because such children have been reported to improve to good recovery and moderate disability by 2 years according to the Lidcombe Impairment Scale [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%