Neuroscience and Social Science 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68421-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiological Approaches to Interpersonal Coordination: Achievements and Pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, experimental designs involve interactional situations that are distant from real social life (Musa et al, 2015; Cornejo et al, 2017a,b). Recent naturalistic and semi-naturalistic research framing coordination in conversational contexts seems to face this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, experimental designs involve interactional situations that are distant from real social life (Musa et al, 2015; Cornejo et al, 2017a,b). Recent naturalistic and semi-naturalistic research framing coordination in conversational contexts seems to face this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the empirical evidence has provided relevant knowledge about the close and bidirectional relation between body coordination and social-affective ties, ecological validity has not always been addressed. In some cases, experimental designs involve interactional situations that are distant from real social life (Musa et al, 2015 ; Cornejo et al, 2017a , b ). Recent naturalistic and semi-naturalistic research framing coordination in conversational contexts seems to face this challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach would instead point out that the flow of the interaction changes along its course, emphasizing the variability of coordination. These fluctuations should not be unexpected since natural human movements are continuously co-adapting to those of others during social interactions ( Boker et al, 2002 ; Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2011 ; Cornejo et al, 2017b ). Evidence from studies tracking movements in ecologically-sound settings has reported changes in coordination patterns between adults and in infant-adult interactions within brief spans of time (between 800 ms and 1,000 ms) similar to those found in this study ( Cornejo et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The differences found at zero-lag on spontaneous and nonspontaneous synchrony accurately measured seem to add evidence to the hypothesis that coordination in natural interactions is discontinuous temporally. Studies on interpersonal coordination in face-to-face social encounters show that synchronous co-activity emerge swiftly and for brief periods [ 3 , 46 , 54 , 66 , 132 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%