Environmental Experience and Plasticity of the Developing Brain 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118931684.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobiology and programming capacity of attachment learning to nurturing and abusive caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neural processes underlying attachment during sensitive periods have been identified and studied in different birds and non-human mammals ( Knudsen, 2004 ; Sullivan and Holman, 2010 ; Landers and Sullivan, 2012 ; Knudsen, 2013 ; Nakamori et al, 2013 ; Roth et al, 2016 ; Feldman, 2017 ; Opendak et al, 2017 ; Opendak and Sullivan, 2019 ). These studies suggest the possible neural underpinnings of imprinting in the human brain.…”
Section: Attachment Dimensions and The Imprinted Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural processes underlying attachment during sensitive periods have been identified and studied in different birds and non-human mammals ( Knudsen, 2004 ; Sullivan and Holman, 2010 ; Landers and Sullivan, 2012 ; Knudsen, 2013 ; Nakamori et al, 2013 ; Roth et al, 2016 ; Feldman, 2017 ; Opendak et al, 2017 ; Opendak and Sullivan, 2019 ). These studies suggest the possible neural underpinnings of imprinting in the human brain.…”
Section: Attachment Dimensions and The Imprinted Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.4.2). Such a mechanism, which has been first assumed by attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969(Bowlby, /1982 and then supported by neuroscientific research (Feldman, 2017;Knudsen, 2004Knudsen, , 2013Landers & Sullivan, 2012;Nakamori et al, 2013;Opendak et al, 2017;Opendak & Sullivan, 2019;Roth et al, 2016;Schore, 1994Schore, , 2009Sullivan & Holman, 2010;Turnbull & Solms, 2003), provides durable knowledge. 2.…”
Section: Stability Of Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…"Optimal attachment communications directly affect the maturation of ( 1) the central nervous system (CNS) limbic system that processes and regulates socialemotional stimuli and ( 2) the autonomic nervous system (ANS) that generates the somatic aspects of emotion." (Schore, 2009, p. 110) Therefore, it is clear that the attachment-caregiving dyadic relationship influences the child's biology and psychology at their root (Feldman, 2015(Feldman, , 2017Landers & Sullivan, 2012;Roth et al, 2016;Schore, 2000). Indeed, attachment dimensions can be regarded as psychological variables whose value is set during early attachmentcaregiving interactions.…”
Section: Physical Proximity For Psychological Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if these individuals continue to display prepared-fear-suppression-effects, it would suggest that the placeholder was not impacted by early caregiver trauma. Animal work suggests that abusive caregivers are still preferred ( 55), yet early life abuse leads to differential neural and psychological development (56) and reduced social buffering in the face of threat (57), raising questions about how this early life experience might impact the social-support placeholder.…”
Section: Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%