1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-67416-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative water content is higher in GM than in WM, indicating that differences in proton density outbalance the effects of relatively low T 1 weighting. The ratio of mean absolute WM to GM amplitudes for the water component is 0.96; this value is confirmed by calculations of T 1 -weighted steady-state signal levels using T 1 s 29 of 832 ms and 1331 ms and water contents 30 of 72% and 82% for WM and GM (assuming equal mass density), 31 respectively.…”
Section: F I G U R Esupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative water content is higher in GM than in WM, indicating that differences in proton density outbalance the effects of relatively low T 1 weighting. The ratio of mean absolute WM to GM amplitudes for the water component is 0.96; this value is confirmed by calculations of T 1 -weighted steady-state signal levels using T 1 s 29 of 832 ms and 1331 ms and water contents 30 of 72% and 82% for WM and GM (assuming equal mass density), 31 respectively.…”
Section: F I G U R Esupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The relative amplitudes presented in Table 2 for the three signal components across WM and GM correspond well with those reported for ex vivo human brain tissue with native water content. 9 The relative water contents of both tissue types are lower than reported in literature, 30 which can be explained by differences in how the values were obtained; here, the water component amplitudes reflect the combination of water proton density and T 1 weighting, whereas literature values typically reflect mass fractions. The component amplitude maps in Figure 6 exhibit substantial differences in the non-brain tissues of the head.…”
Section: Component Amplitudesmentioning
confidence: 79%