2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00328-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognition and community outcome in schizophrenia: long-term predictive validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ratings for each of the two GF scales were based on available clinical information, which included clinician reports, telephone and face to face follow-up assessments. High inter-rater reliabilities (Fujii et al, 2003) were reported using this approach, along with construct and predictive validity (Cannon et al, 2008;Cornblatt et al, 2007).…”
Section: Global Functioning: Social and Role Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ratings for each of the two GF scales were based on available clinical information, which included clinician reports, telephone and face to face follow-up assessments. High inter-rater reliabilities (Fujii et al, 2003) were reported using this approach, along with construct and predictive validity (Cannon et al, 2008;Cornblatt et al, 2007).…”
Section: Global Functioning: Social and Role Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive deficits in memory, executive function, and working memory are believed to be of major importance to the functional and symptomatic outcome (Fujii and Wylie, 2003;Moritz et al, 2000;Grawe and Levander, 2001;Green et al, 2000) as well as the quality of life (Fujii et al, 2004) of patients with schizophrenia. Being able to address some of these symptoms in a preclinical model and consequently develop drugs that better target these symptoms could lead to better outcome and better quality of life for the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurocognitive impairments in schizophrenia have been linked to treatment response, employment status, social relationships, living status, insight into illness, therapeutic alliance and community functioning [1] . Thus it is reasonable to suppose that cognitive impairment can also be a rate-limiting factor in some psychological treatments and that the severity of cognitive impairment may limit its clinical benefit as well [2] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%