Neurocognitive assessment of emotional context sensitivity

Abstract

Sensitivity to emotional context is an emerging construct for characterizing adaptive or maladaptive emotion regulation, but few measurement approaches exist. The current study combined behavioral and neurocognitive measures to assess context sensitivity in relation to self-report measures of adaptive emotional flexibility and well-being. Sixty-six adults completed an emotional go/no-go task using happy, fearful, and neutral faces as go and no-go cues, while EEG was recorded to generate event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting attentional selection and discrimination (N170) and cognitive control (N2). Context sensitivity was measured as the degree of emotional facilitation or disruption in the go/no-go task and magnitude of ERP response to emotion cues. Participants self-reported on emotional flexibility, anxiety, and depression. Overall participants evidenced emotional context sensitivity, such that when happy faces were go stimuli, accuracy improved (greater behavioral facilitation), whereas when fearful faces were no-go stimuli, errors increased (disrupted behavioral inhibition). These indices predicted emotional flexibility and well-being: greater behavioral facilitation following happy cues was associated with lower depression and anxiety, whereas greater disruption in behavioral inhibition following fearful cues was associated with lower flexibility. ERP indices of context sensitivity revealed additional associations: greater N2 to fear go cues was associated with less anxiety and depression, and greater N2 and N170 to happy and fear no-go cues, respectively, were associated with greater emotional flexibility and well-being. Results suggest that pleasant and unpleasant emotions selectively enhance and disrupt components of context sensitivity, and that behavioral and ERP indices of context sensitivity predict flexibility and well-being.

The Tension Between Cognitive and Regulatory Flexibility and Their Associations With Current and Lifetime PTSD Symptoms

“…Finally, we evaluated cognitive and regulatory flexibility solely through the use of self-report measures. While these measures are widely used and provide insights into individuals’ behaviors ( Palm and Follette, 2011 ; Freeman et al, 2013 ; Myruski et al, 2017 ; Rodin et al, 2017 ), future studies may wish to include both self-report and performance-based paradigms in order to complement these findings.…”

Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the Emotional Style Questionnaire

“…For instance, individuals with better awareness skills demonstrate more effective self-regulatory ability in social interaction (Ferri, Chiarelli, Merla, Gallese, & Costantini, 2013). Sensitivity to emotional context is an emerging construct for characterizing adaptive or maladaptive emotion regulation, but few measurement approaches exist (Myruski, Bonanno, Gulyayeva, Egan, & Dennis-Tiwary, 2017).…”

Understanding Emotion Inflexibility in Risk for Affective Disease: Integrating Current Research and Finding a Path Forward

“…Apart from a handful of recent studies, there has been little work tying emotion inflexibility with top-down cognitive control and bottom-up activation. For example, Myruski and colleagues adapted a task designed to assess responsivity to emotional context for use with EEG, demonstrating some association between context sensitivity and behavioral facilitation (indexed as event-related potentials) and well-being (Myruski et al., 2017). However, there is already a rapidly developing research literature of treatments attempting to address the imbalance of bottom-up versus top-down control in affective disorders (e.g., Amir et al., 2009; Britton et al., 2013; Schweizer et al., 2013).…”