2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0837-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognitive function in current and ex-users of ecstasy in comparison to both matched polydrug-using controls and drug-naïve controls

Abstract: The results suggest that recreational drug use in general, rather than ecstasy use per se, can lead to subtle cognitive impairments and that recent drug use appears to impact strongest on cognitive performance. This study highlights the importance of controlling for the use of all recreational drugs and, in particular, recent drug use when investigating 'effects of ecstasy' on cognitive function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More frequent use of ecstasy was associated with more mistakes. Similar results have been reported by Fox et al (2001Fox et al ( , 2002 and Wareing et al (2007), although it has to be noted that there have also been negative findings (Hoshi et al, 2007). Taken together, our results suggest a subtle impairment of the central executive component of working memory (Baddeley, 2003): Again, this finding may reflect dysfunctions within frontal brain areas (Fray and Robbins, 1996).…”
Section: Working Memorysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More frequent use of ecstasy was associated with more mistakes. Similar results have been reported by Fox et al (2001Fox et al ( , 2002 and Wareing et al (2007), although it has to be noted that there have also been negative findings (Hoshi et al, 2007). Taken together, our results suggest a subtle impairment of the central executive component of working memory (Baddeley, 2003): Again, this finding may reflect dysfunctions within frontal brain areas (Fray and Robbins, 1996).…”
Section: Working Memorysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Fox et al, 2001;von Geusau et al, 2004), although there are also negative results (e.g. Hoshi et al, 2007). Concerning fluency tasks, some studies reported a weaker performance (Bhattachary and Powell, 2001;Croft et al, 2001;Fox et al, 2002;Heffernan et al, 2001), but again, other studies were not able to replicate these findings (Hoshi et al, 2007;Reneman et al, 2006b;Wareing et al, 2000), or, in one case, even showed contradictory results, with lower verbal and better figural fluency performance (Yip and Lee, 2005).…”
Section: Ecstasymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations