2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

67
888
3
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,199 publications
(962 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
67
888
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous neuroimaging studies reported similar findings. In a PET study Price (2000) demonstrated an increase in blood volume in the SFG and these findings were confirmed by successive fMRI studies reporting on BOLD-contrast increases in the SFG (Binder et al, 2003;Ischebeck et al, 2004;Kuchinke et al, 2005; for a review of the role of the SFG in decision-related processes also see Ridderinkhof et al, 2004). Finally the SFG's role in generating a lexical decision is supported by the finding that word/ Table 1 Channel t-values within the regions of interest Channel numbers, MNI coordinates, estimated inter-subject variability (SD) and significant uncorrected t-values (df = 11, p's ≤ 0.05, two-tailed) are given.…”
Section: The Lexicality Effectmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous neuroimaging studies reported similar findings. In a PET study Price (2000) demonstrated an increase in blood volume in the SFG and these findings were confirmed by successive fMRI studies reporting on BOLD-contrast increases in the SFG (Binder et al, 2003;Ischebeck et al, 2004;Kuchinke et al, 2005; for a review of the role of the SFG in decision-related processes also see Ridderinkhof et al, 2004). Finally the SFG's role in generating a lexical decision is supported by the finding that word/ Table 1 Channel t-values within the regions of interest Channel numbers, MNI coordinates, estimated inter-subject variability (SD) and significant uncorrected t-values (df = 11, p's ≤ 0.05, two-tailed) are given.…”
Section: The Lexicality Effectmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Words not only elicited a greater SFG activation than PWs, but also more errors. Error processing has been assumed to rely on the anterior cingulate (Yeung et al, 2004), but also on the mediofrontal gyrus (Ridderinkhof et al, 2004), which is part of the SFG. Though actual errors were excluded from the analyses, Yeung et al propose that errors may be activated partially, even when a correct response is generated.…”
Section: The Lexicality Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of the 25 EXIT items assess the ability to inhibit an automatic behavior, and three items capture error detection or conflict monitoring. These items fall precisely into the above definition of cognitive control (see also (33,34). Future studies could usefully focus on cognitive control as a specific facet of executive function that may be relevant to the emergence of suicidal thoughts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in particular, it assesses the ability to think and reflect on the consequences of a choice prior to making a decision. The ventromedial section in the prefrontal cortex has been indicated as the most critical neural structure underlying these processes (Bechara, 2004;Ridderinkhof et al, 2004). Motor impulsivity or response inhibition as measured in the stop-signal task or go/no-go task, on the other hand, is believed to relate to the control of motor processes that are subserved by the anterior cingulate (Bechara, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%