2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00492.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocognitive profiles in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder: differences in pattern and magnitude of dysfunction

Abstract: Patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder in this study have different neurocognitive profiles. Bipolar I patients have more widespread cognitive dysfunction both in pattern and magnitude, and a higher proportion has clinically significant cognitive impairments compared with patients with bipolar II. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two bipolar subgroups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
143
3
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
20
143
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neurocognitive impairment is observed in both bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and bipolar II disorder patients during euthymia, but usually is greater among BP-I patients (13,14). Consistently, nearly two-thirds of BPD patients in clinical remission complain of subjective awareness of cognitive dysfunctions associated with the illness or its treatment (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Neurocognitive impairment is observed in both bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and bipolar II disorder patients during euthymia, but usually is greater among BP-I patients (13,14). Consistently, nearly two-thirds of BPD patients in clinical remission complain of subjective awareness of cognitive dysfunctions associated with the illness or its treatment (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two other studies found that the intellectual decline was less pronounced in BD-II in comparison to BD-I patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Bruno et al 2006 ). There are several studies indicating an impairment in attention and psychomotor speed Andersson et al 2008 ;Dittmann et al 2008a ;Hsiao et al 2009 ;Harkavy-Friedman et al 2006 ;Holmes et al 2008 ), but other studies disagree (Simonsen et al 2008 ;Savitz et al 2008 ). Reaction time was reported to be similar to that of controls (Berns et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Bd-iimentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, BD-II patients have been reported to perform similar to healthy controls (Savitz et al 2008 ;Taylor Tavares et al 2007 ;Derntl et al 2009 ); to perform in-between healthy controls and BD-I patients (Dittmann et al 2008a ;Martino et al 2011a ;Simonsen et al 2008 ;Andersson et al 2008 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Derntl et al 2009 ;Xu et al 2012 ;Hsiao et al 2009 ), specifi cally in verbal memory (Martinez-Aran et al 2004 ;Torrent et al 2006 ) and executive functions ; to perform similar to BD-I patients (Chang et al 2011 ;Ha et al 2012 ;Dittmann et al 2008a ;Martino et al 2011a ); or even to perform worse than BD-I, at least in some specifi c neurocognitive domains, that is, aspects of reaction time and inhibition (Summers et al 2006 ;Harkavy-Friedman et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Bd-iimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The authors proposed that the poor performance in schizophrenia patients occurred because of the presence of psychotic symptoms, the duration of the illness, and hospitalization. Simonsen et al (2008) found that BD patients with psychotic symptoms have similar performance as schizophrenia patients in some neurocognitive tasks, such as verbal memory and processing speed. Some authors (Andreasen, & Powers, 1974;Strauss, Bohannon, Stephens, & Pauker, 1984;Goldberg et al, 1993;Evans et al, 1999) believe that defining the mood state in samples of BD patients is important because manic patients perform worse than depressive or euthymic patients in working memory, selective attention, and divided attention tasks, and manic patients perform similarly to schizophrenia patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%