2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cross-modal associations and their influence on perceptual decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it could also be argued that by establishing an intermediate link, the association could be more robust and last longer, as a correlational/statistical path has already been set for the correspondence to develop via a top‐down approach. As past literature has shown, both bottom‐up and top‐down approaches play a role in the formation of crossmodal correspondences (Bolam, Boyle, Ince, & Delis, 2022; Getz & Kubovy, 2018; Peiffer‐Smadja & Cohen, 2019). That being said, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first one to investigate the lifespan of experimentally induced crossmodal correspondences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it could also be argued that by establishing an intermediate link, the association could be more robust and last longer, as a correlational/statistical path has already been set for the correspondence to develop via a top‐down approach. As past literature has shown, both bottom‐up and top‐down approaches play a role in the formation of crossmodal correspondences (Bolam, Boyle, Ince, & Delis, 2022; Getz & Kubovy, 2018; Peiffer‐Smadja & Cohen, 2019). That being said, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first one to investigate the lifespan of experimentally induced crossmodal correspondences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study extends the theory of musical concordance to crossmodal research. Most previous research has focused more on the crossmodal association between the fixed pitch and figure (Bolam et al, 2022; Bonetti & Costa, 2018; Gallace & Spence, 2006). However, the world we live in is constantly evolving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants' response time was significantly faster under the congruent, rather than the incongruent condition. This discovery has been confirmed many times in recent years (Bolam et al, 2022;Bonetti & Costa, 2018), and the pitch-size correspondence is a sensory processing feature shared by other species rather than unique to humans (Korzeniowska et al, 2022). In theory, this crossmodal correspondence between sound and figure can be explained by Bayesian "coupling priors," namely, perception is influenced by expectations from the environment (Klaffehn et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This analysis was crucial because the results of Experiment 2 did not clearly speak to why auditory–visual intensity correspondence does not manifest in both classification tasks. To our knowledge, none of these three analysis methods have previously been applied to study crossmodal correspondences in speeded classification tasks (but see e.g., Bolam et al, 2022; Parise & Spence, 2012, for distributional and diffusion model analyses of crossmodal implicit association effects).…”
Section: Conflict-task Modeling Of Crossmodal Intensity Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%