2017
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental maturation as a function of irritable temperament

Abstract: Few studies have investigated the neural systems involved in decreasing behavioral reactivity to emotional stimuli as children age. It has been suggested that this process may interact with temperament-linked variations in neurodevelopment to better explain individual differences in the maturation of emotion regulation. In this investigation, children ages 4–12 (n=30, mean age=7.62 years, SD=1.71 years) and adults (n=21, mean age=26.67 years) watched clips from popular children’s films containing positive, neg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, higher irritability was related to increased activation in children and younger adolescents but not older adolescents; the association was particularly strong in young children. This finding is inconsistent with the only previous study that examined the interacting effect of age and irritability and found that, as age increased, higher irritability was associated with more frontal-striatalthalamic activation (17). This discrepancy could be explained by differences in sample size ( N =30 vs. 195 here); sample characteristics e.g., age (4–12 vs. 8–18 years here) and the nature of the sample (non-clinical vs. clinical sample here); and fMRI paradigm (viewing of emotionally- or neutrally-valenced video clips vs. frustrating cued-attention task here).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, higher irritability was related to increased activation in children and younger adolescents but not older adolescents; the association was particularly strong in young children. This finding is inconsistent with the only previous study that examined the interacting effect of age and irritability and found that, as age increased, higher irritability was associated with more frontal-striatalthalamic activation (17). This discrepancy could be explained by differences in sample size ( N =30 vs. 195 here); sample characteristics e.g., age (4–12 vs. 8–18 years here) and the nature of the sample (non-clinical vs. clinical sample here); and fMRI paradigm (viewing of emotionally- or neutrally-valenced video clips vs. frustrating cued-attention task here).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…For example, the protracted development of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been linked to age-related improvements in attention shifting and cognitive control, which can modulate affective arousal (1114). While agerelated brain mechanisms have been examined in some clinical populations (e.g., anxiety and depression) (15,16), little work is available in irritability (8,17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transition from the rapid developmental change of early childhood). However, it should be noted that the current sample size is similar to or larger than samples studied in much of the extant literature on irritability (Andre et al, 2019;Bolhuis et al, 2019;Briggs-Gowan et al, 2019;Karim & Perlman, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Using optical neuroimaging tools to study the brain during naturalistic viewing conditions has broad applicability for experimental questions demanding rich, engaging stimuli alongside wearable and ergonomic imaging tools 17,66 . Developmental cognitive neuroscience has benefitted from the broad applicability of optical neuroimaging tools for imaging the developing brain 16,5658,6769 . Paired with optical neuroimaging, the movie-based imaging paradigm described in this paper provides engaging and ecologically relevant study designs for understanding information processing across the lifespan, highlighting the richness of this paradigm for interrogating “real-life” brain function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%