2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Early Childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that logistic regression models seemed to show a trend of poorer language skills in children with low socioeconomic status, regardless the type of feeding received. There are different factors, such as genetic background, sex, intrauterine growth restriction, nutrition, maternal education, and socioeconomic status, among others, that have an important role during brain development [39]. Others researchers have reported that children born in families with lower socioeconomic status showed slower language development [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that logistic regression models seemed to show a trend of poorer language skills in children with low socioeconomic status, regardless the type of feeding received. There are different factors, such as genetic background, sex, intrauterine growth restriction, nutrition, maternal education, and socioeconomic status, among others, that have an important role during brain development [39]. Others researchers have reported that children born in families with lower socioeconomic status showed slower language development [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that the neonatal brain injury can result not only in motor dysfunction, but can also lead to several other neurological deficits including visual and auditory impairments and behavioral abnormalities (2, 5, 44). In recent years, ERPs have been used to help determine cognitive and neurodevelopmental difficulties in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased admissions for prematurity (although not reaching statistical significance) with comparatively lower top‐up transfusion rates ( P = 0.016) for fetuses born at the study centre compared to other centres, suggest we are aggressive in our approach to early delivery. We could therefore potentially afford to delay delivery and subsequently reduce the risks associated with prematurity, namely long‐term neurodevelopmental risks 24 . Such an approach needs to be balanced against the risks of increased neonatal intervention (if delivery is delayed without giving an extra antenatal transfusion) or further IUT (if this is used to delay delivery until 37 + weeks).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%