1982
DOI: 10.1159/000121591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroevolutionary Mechanisms of Cerebral Asymmetry in Man

Abstract: Cerebral asymmetry in man has by and large been interpreted in terms of differences at the level of hemispheric organization. The inadequacy of a hemispheric interpretation as a biological account of asymmetry is discussed and a model of the neural mechanisms of cerebral asymmetry is developed. The model focuses on the functional organization of the inferior parietal cortex in human and non-human primates and accounts for the evolution and expression of cerebral asymmetry in man in terms of specific adaptation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gender infl uence on a drawing task is more generally known as a male advantage when considering visual-spatial tasks [15,48] . One of the most famous theories on gender differences in visual versus verbal tasks concerns the hemispheric specialization of the brain [for reviews, see 49,50] . Another explanatory variable that was integrated in our statistical model was the presence of depressive symptomatology (assessed by the CES-D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gender infl uence on a drawing task is more generally known as a male advantage when considering visual-spatial tasks [15,48] . One of the most famous theories on gender differences in visual versus verbal tasks concerns the hemispheric specialization of the brain [for reviews, see 49,50] . Another explanatory variable that was integrated in our statistical model was the presence of depressive symptomatology (assessed by the CES-D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is significant that we did not obtain lateral differences in forehead temperature in any of the studies. These lateral differences have been repeatedly found (Fox & Davidson, 1986), although the hypothesis that the hemispheres perform distinct functions does not enjoy complete consensus (LeDoux, 1982). Absence, in the present research, of lateral differences in forehead temperature may be due to the communication between the left and the right supratrocheal veins through the transverse nasal arch before each drains into the supraorbital vein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the left, the IPL is part of the posterior language area bordering Wernicke’s area; on the right, it is associated with spatial processing. The IPL is characterized by extensive connections with the limbic system, and LeDoux (1982) suggested that it might play a major role in connecting emotional and language systems. Moreover, the primate/human brain at the subcortical level is characterized by something of a natural right-left disconnection: Structures such as the right and left amygdalae are more closely connected with ipsilateral neocortex than with each other (Demeter, Rosene, & Van Hoesen, 1990; Wilson, Isokawa, Babb, & Crandal, 1990; Wilson et al, 1991).…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Hemispheric Differences In Prosocial ...mentioning
confidence: 99%