2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurofilament sidearms modulate parallel and crossed-filament orientations inducing nematic to isotropic and re-entrant birefringent hydrogels

Abstract: Neurofilaments are intermediate filaments assembled from the subunits neurofilament-low, neurofilament-medium and neurofilament-high. In axons, parallel neurofilaments form a nematic liquid-crystal hydrogel with network structure arising from interactions between the neurofilaments' C-terminal sidearms. Here we report, using small-angle X-ray-scattering, polarized-microscopy and rheometry, that with decreasing ionic strength, neurofilament-lowhigh, neurofilament-low-medium and neurofilament-low-medium-high hyd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This distinction in network substructure is also reflected in phasedependent mechanical and water retention properties. The N G and I G phases had elastic plateau modulus (G 0 ) ≈ 100 -200 Pa, comparable to other physical hydrogels [31], whereas the B G phase had significantly larger G 0 ≈ 3000 -4000 Pa (similar to chemically cross-linked hydrogels), presumably due to a much larger number and/or strength of crosslinks per unit volume [27,32]. In addition, the water retention propensity (reported as a percent of the normalized gel weight after 24 hrs of drying) of the B G (≈ 60%) is remarkably higher than that of the N G (≈ 40%) I G (less than 10%) phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This distinction in network substructure is also reflected in phasedependent mechanical and water retention properties. The N G and I G phases had elastic plateau modulus (G 0 ) ≈ 100 -200 Pa, comparable to other physical hydrogels [31], whereas the B G phase had significantly larger G 0 ≈ 3000 -4000 Pa (similar to chemically cross-linked hydrogels), presumably due to a much larger number and/or strength of crosslinks per unit volume [27,32]. In addition, the water retention propensity (reported as a percent of the normalized gel weight after 24 hrs of drying) of the B G (≈ 60%) is remarkably higher than that of the N G (≈ 40%) I G (less than 10%) phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The shape and water-retention properties of each of the hydrogels, coupled with POM images and scattering data, helped construct probable models for the relative strength of interfilament interactions and the average arrangement of constituent filaments, depicted in (iv.). Figure adapted from [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations