2009
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617708090164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging correlates of parent ratings of working memory in typically developing children

Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to investigate construct validity of parent ratings of working memory in children, using a multi-trait/multi-method design including neuroimaging, rating scales, and performance-based measures. Thirty-five typically developing children completed performancebased tests of working memory and nonexecutive function (EF) skills, received volumetric MRI, and were rated by parents on both EF-specific and broad behavior rating scales. After controlling for total cerebral volume and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(100 reference statements)
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standardized scores were used for all performance-based measures and rating scales. Outlier scores were truncated to four standard deviations to reduce skewness (Mahone et al, 2009). In order to determine if outcome measures changed significantly, we conducted paired t-tests for behavior functions, and a repeated measures ANOVA on the ten composite scores provided by the CNS-VS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized scores were used for all performance-based measures and rating scales. Outlier scores were truncated to four standard deviations to reduce skewness (Mahone et al, 2009). In order to determine if outcome measures changed significantly, we conducted paired t-tests for behavior functions, and a repeated measures ANOVA on the ten composite scores provided by the CNS-VS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontal and parietal grey matter volume (Mahone, Martin, Kates, Hay, & Horska, 2009; Rossi et al., 2013), and temporal and parietal connections of the corpus callosum (Treble et al., 2013), are significant predictors of a participant's working memory capacity. However, these studies either investigate narrow age ranges or statistically correct for the effect of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies consistently find that N-back performance is associated with activation in prefrontal and parietal cortical regions widely recognized as the primary neural substrates that underlie working memory processes (Garlinghouse, Roth, Isquith, Flashman, & Saykin, 2010; Goldman-Rakic, 1995; Grön, 1998; Mahone, Martin, Kates, Hay, & Horská, 2009; Owen, McMillan, Laird, & Bullmore, 2005; Petrides, 1995; Smith & Jonides, 1998). Patterns of neural activation associated with N-back performance have been shown to vary with the type of information held in working memory (e.g., verbal or spatial), as well as task difficulty (0, 1, 2-back; see Rottschy et al, 2012; Smith & Jonides, 1998 for reviews).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%