2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging evidence for sensitivity to orthography-to-phonology conversion in native readers and foreign learners of Chinese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual‐differences studies from recent years confirm this prediction, suggesting that individual SL performance in fact predicts variability in linguistic outcomes. In this vein, individual differences in SL performance among both children and adults were shown to correlate with abilities such as syntactic processing (Kidd, ; Kidd & Arciuli, ; Misyak, Christiansen, & Tomblin, ), lexical knowledge and vocabulary size (Mainela‐Arnold & Evans, ; Shafto, Conway, Field, & Houston, ; Singh, Steven Reznick, & Xuehua, ; Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, & Lonigan, ), speech perception (Conway et al, ; Conway, Karpicke, & Pisoni, ; Lany, Shoaib, Thompson, & Estes, ), and literacy acquisition in first language (Arciuli & Simpson, ; Tong, Leung, & Tong, ; Torkildsen, Arciuli, & Wie, ) as well as second language (Frost, Siegelman, Narkiss, & Afek, ; A. Yu et al, ; see Arciuli, for a review). More direct evidence comes from a handful of longitudinal studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual‐differences studies from recent years confirm this prediction, suggesting that individual SL performance in fact predicts variability in linguistic outcomes. In this vein, individual differences in SL performance among both children and adults were shown to correlate with abilities such as syntactic processing (Kidd, ; Kidd & Arciuli, ; Misyak, Christiansen, & Tomblin, ), lexical knowledge and vocabulary size (Mainela‐Arnold & Evans, ; Shafto, Conway, Field, & Houston, ; Singh, Steven Reznick, & Xuehua, ; Spencer, Kaschak, Jones, & Lonigan, ), speech perception (Conway et al, ; Conway, Karpicke, & Pisoni, ; Lany, Shoaib, Thompson, & Estes, ), and literacy acquisition in first language (Arciuli & Simpson, ; Tong, Leung, & Tong, ; Torkildsen, Arciuli, & Wie, ) as well as second language (Frost, Siegelman, Narkiss, & Afek, ; A. Yu et al, ; see Arciuli, for a review). More direct evidence comes from a handful of longitudinal studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the children in Chen et al's (2019) study, children in this region have very little experience with desktop computers. The vast majority of households we have polled in our study region report owning basic mobile phones (92%), and 63% of households reported owning one or more smartphones.…”
Section: Statistical Learning In Cȏte D'ivoirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies support this connection between performance on SL tasks and literacy achievement for both adults and school-aged children using non-linguistic visual SL (sequences of images, e.g., Arciuli & Simpson, 2012;Qi et al, 2019;Torkildsen et al, 2019), non-linguistic auditory SL (sequences of pure tones, e.g., Qi et al, 2019), and word sequencing tasks (Bogaerts et al, 2016). The SL-literacy relationship is also preserved in second language literacy acquisition, but to date, the correlation of SL with L2 literacy has only been tested in adults (Frost et al, 2013;Yu, 2016;Yu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Statistical Learning and Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension of these findings to L2 literacy remains limited, but the availability of statistical learning mechanisms throughout the lifespan and their importance in L1 learning suggest a contribution to L2 literacy as well. A few studies find that outcomes for adult L2 learners are predictable based on their performance in visual statistical learning tasks (Frost et al., 2013; Yu, 2016) and that compensatory brain activity during L2 reading is inversely related to visual statistical learning performance (Yu et al., 2018). Frost et al.’s (2013) study of adult L2 Hebrew learners found that the relationship between visual statistical learning and Hebrew literacy was similar in adult L2 learners to that previously described for L1 readers of Hebrew, and the pattern‐learning ability measured by this visual statistical learning task was not a strong correlate of other variables that might have explained such a correlation (i.e., general cognitive abilities).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%