2021
DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Abstract: Purpose of review Neuroimaging research on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) continues growing in extent and complexity, although it has yet to become clinically meaningful. We review recent MRI research on ADHD, to identify robust findings, current trends and challenges. Recent findings We identified 40 publications between January 2019 and September 2020 reporting or reviewing MRI research on ADHD. Four meta-analyses have presented conflicting results regard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these investigations have identified a variety of distinct and localized structural and functional brain features associated with ADHD (Albajara Sáenz, Villemonteix, and Massat 2019; Hoogman et al 2020; Mooney et al 2021), results have not yet yielded reliable replication. This is likely secondary to relatively small brain-behavior effect sizes (Pereira-Sanchez and Castellanos 2021; Feczko et al 2021; Marek et al 2020; Smith and Nichols 2018). Nonetheless, considerable evidence supports the proposal that biological and physiological correlates of ADHD are not simply localized alterations in brain function, but rather constitute widely distributed functional brain systems as evaluated by resting state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these investigations have identified a variety of distinct and localized structural and functional brain features associated with ADHD (Albajara Sáenz, Villemonteix, and Massat 2019; Hoogman et al 2020; Mooney et al 2021), results have not yet yielded reliable replication. This is likely secondary to relatively small brain-behavior effect sizes (Pereira-Sanchez and Castellanos 2021; Feczko et al 2021; Marek et al 2020; Smith and Nichols 2018). Nonetheless, considerable evidence supports the proposal that biological and physiological correlates of ADHD are not simply localized alterations in brain function, but rather constitute widely distributed functional brain systems as evaluated by resting state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SC-FC coupling in the DMN significantly differed between ADHD subtypes, the subnetworks seem to work together to manifest a different degree of inattentiveness and hyperactivity in the ADHD-I and ADHD-C groups. Given that structural differences between individuals with ADHD and controls has been demonstrated in children but not adults, further work on the SC-FC coupling should include longitudinal data [ 93 ]. These findings suggest that the structure-function network relationship may provide important neurobiological clues for understanding ADHD subtypes in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “Clínica Universidad de Navarra Metilfenidato” (CUNMET) study was designed as a proof-of-concept study in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. [see also ( 6 , 9 )]. The study was based at the child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient service at Clínica Universidad de Navarra, a tertiary university hospital in the north of Spain.…”
Section: The Cunmet Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another major limitation was the limited sample size, even if it was in line with that of most previous studies ( 9 ). Small sizes have been endemic in neuroimaging research of ADHD ( 6 , 8 ), and medication studies present further logistical complications for recruitment and retention of participants. This is partially offset by the within-subject analyses which increase statistical power relative to cross-sectional designs ( 29 ).…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation