2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00075-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroimaging methods to evaluate the etiology and consequences of epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
25

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
19
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…More marked abnormality of the cerebral cortex on MRI was reported in case 2 (poor hippocampal formation), case 5 (patchy periventricular increased T1 signal and prominence of temporal horns of the lateral ventricles), and case 10 (frontotemporal hypoplasia with temporal dysplasia). These changes of temporal lobe hypoplasia/ dysplasia are similar to those described in some patients with temporal lobe epilepsies, and could be due to primary cerebral dysgenesis or acquired temporal lobe damage from resistant seizures [Salmenperä et al, 2001;Duncan, 2002]. However, two of our patients (case 2, case 10) did not have a history of seizures, so it seems likely that the findings represent cerebral dysgenesis rather than an acquired abnormality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…More marked abnormality of the cerebral cortex on MRI was reported in case 2 (poor hippocampal formation), case 5 (patchy periventricular increased T1 signal and prominence of temporal horns of the lateral ventricles), and case 10 (frontotemporal hypoplasia with temporal dysplasia). These changes of temporal lobe hypoplasia/ dysplasia are similar to those described in some patients with temporal lobe epilepsies, and could be due to primary cerebral dysgenesis or acquired temporal lobe damage from resistant seizures [Salmenperä et al, 2001;Duncan, 2002]. However, two of our patients (case 2, case 10) did not have a history of seizures, so it seems likely that the findings represent cerebral dysgenesis rather than an acquired abnormality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In agreement with previous studies [34,35], 18 FDG-PET was not able to lateralize or localize the epileptogenic zone in all patients. In our study, 18 FDG-PET was effective in only in three patients; the remaining four subjects had normal glucose metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4 Currently, these techniques are considered reliable and reproducible for the detection of hippocampal pathology. 11 However, hippocampal volumetry by manual segmentation is time-consuming and depends on the expertise of the examiner. These 2 features have limited its use in clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%