1974
DOI: 10.1093/bja/46.4.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEUROLEPTANAESTHESIA FOR MAJOR SURGERY: Experience with 500 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroleptanaesthesia has established itself as a very useful technique. Its major advantages include an uncomplicated induction, cardiovascular stability during maintenance of anaesthesia and a recovery phase characterized by a rapid return to consciousness and absence of restlessness and vomiting (Morgan, Lumley and Gillies, 1974). However, the "ideal" anaesthetic agent should either have a short duration of action or have an effective antagonist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neuroleptanaesthesia has established itself as a very useful technique. Its major advantages include an uncomplicated induction, cardiovascular stability during maintenance of anaesthesia and a recovery phase characterized by a rapid return to consciousness and absence of restlessness and vomiting (Morgan, Lumley and Gillies, 1974). However, the "ideal" anaesthetic agent should either have a short duration of action or have an effective antagonist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither criterion is truly satisfied by the drugs used during neuroleptanaesthesia, such as fentanyl and droperidol. Indeed, Morgan, Lumley and Gillies (1974) report that 18% of their patients did not establish adequate spontaneous ventilation at the end of anaesthesia. In addition, planned major operations may be terminated unexpectedly and so the search for an effective antagonist is of practical importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3536] Neuroleptanaesthesia (combination of droperidol and fentanyl) appears to offer some advantage as it preserves a good cardiovascular stability during pheochromocytoma resection. [37] Droperidol has got antiarrhythmic effects and acts as antiemetic by blocking α-2 receptors and inhibiting catecholamine re-uptake.…”
Section: Peri-op Anesthetic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of analgesic used may be compared with that in two other similar trials (table VI). Morgan, Lumley and Gillies (1974) found an average requirement of fentanyl of 0.102 mg/h (approximately 0.24 (xg/kg/min), and Foldes, Shiflman and Kronfeld (1970), in a double-blind trial, found the requirement of fentanyl to be 0.33 + 0.002 [xg/kg/min, and of pethidine to be 28.2 + 1.5 [xg/kg/min (in the patients who received a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant). These figures are at the lower limit of the dose range found in the present trial, but in both of the other studies droperidol was used in addition, and the concentrations of nitrous oxide were greater.…”
Section: Total Dose Of Analgesicmentioning
confidence: 99%