1978
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770350017001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroleptic-induced Prolactin Level Elevation and Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Epidemiological studies have produced inconsistent findings (Overall, 1978;Schyve, 1978;Wagner & Mantel, 1978;Kanhouwa et al, 1984;Nakane et al, 1986;Gulbinat et al, 1992;Halbreich et al, 1996;Lichtermann et al, 2001), although a more recent cohort study reported a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07 -1.26) for breast cancer associated with use of neuroleptic medication, as well as a positive dose -response relationship (Wang et al, 2002). This study included information on a number of factors not included in previous studies, but residual confounding by factors such as reproductive history and family history of breast cancer or incomplete information on socioeconomic status and exogenous hormone use cannot be ruled out (Wang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epidemiological studies have produced inconsistent findings (Overall, 1978;Schyve, 1978;Wagner & Mantel, 1978;Kanhouwa et al, 1984;Nakane et al, 1986;Gulbinat et al, 1992;Halbreich et al, 1996;Lichtermann et al, 2001), although a more recent cohort study reported a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07 -1.26) for breast cancer associated with use of neuroleptic medication, as well as a positive dose -response relationship (Wang et al, 2002). This study included information on a number of factors not included in previous studies, but residual confounding by factors such as reproductive history and family history of breast cancer or incomplete information on socioeconomic status and exogenous hormone use cannot be ruled out (Wang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, concern has been raised that neuroleptic medication may increase breast cancer risk due to their prolactinincreasing effect (Schyve et al, 1978) and this has been reported among women with schizophrenia (Nakane and Ohta, 1986;Gulbinat et al, 1992;Lichtermann et al, 2001) and a range of psychiatric disorders (Halbreich et al, 1996;Wang et al, 2002). The few studies of breast cancer risk in patients treated with neuroleptics have mainly found no excess (Overall, 1978;Wagner and Mantel, 1978;Kanhouwa et al, 1984;Kelly et al, 1999), an exception being a recent cohort study (Wang et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 presents the conditions in which elevated PRL values and/or HPRL can arise [5, 15, 17, 23, 29, 57, 115, 157159]. …”
Section: Causes Of Elevated Prl Values and Hprlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuro leptics, however, do not increase the incidence of breast cancer in patients who receive long-term treatment with these drugs. 13 Elevated prolactin levels can also contrib ute to menstrual irregularities and sexual dysfunction. Changing the regimen to a lower potency dopamine D-2 antagonist may produce a lower level of hyperprolactinemia, which may cause these side effects to subside.…”
Section: Drug Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%