The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315731162-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurolinguistics of Humor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originating from incongruity resolution theory and comprehension-elaboration theory, this perspective has been verified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (Chan et al, 2012 , 2013 ; Shibata et al, 2014 ). Among these studies, Chan et al (2013) and Chen et al (2017) proposed the Three-stage Model of Humor Processing based on the course of humor processing in incongruity resolution theory. Chan et al ( 2012 , 2013 ) used five stimuli, including incongruity-resolution jokes, unfunny, garden-path, nonsense, and nonsensical sentences, and identified three stages of humor processing by comparing the imaging data of two of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originating from incongruity resolution theory and comprehension-elaboration theory, this perspective has been verified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (Chan et al, 2012 , 2013 ; Shibata et al, 2014 ). Among these studies, Chan et al (2013) and Chen et al (2017) proposed the Three-stage Model of Humor Processing based on the course of humor processing in incongruity resolution theory. Chan et al ( 2012 , 2013 ) used five stimuli, including incongruity-resolution jokes, unfunny, garden-path, nonsense, and nonsensical sentences, and identified three stages of humor processing by comparing the imaging data of two of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And so various experiential states will be classified as "anger" not because they share any sort of deep phenomenological similarity or mechanistic underpinning, but because the way in which we've been taught to apply the "anger" concept directly influences how we make sense of our own experiences. The illusion that we can all  E. g., Adamczyk et al 2017;Bambini et al 2020;Bischetti et al 2019;Mobbs et al 2003;Rozengurt 2011;Samson 2013;Samson and Hegenloh 2010;Chen et al 2017. easily recognize anger when we experience it comes from the fact that our experiences are structured by, and filtered through, our emotion concepts. Thus, we force our experiences to fit into the categories we provide, instead of recognizing some fundamental similarity between different experiential states.…”
Section: What's So Funny About Studying Humormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say that such correlational data is not relevant or important. Only that we must be extremely cautious about what can, and about what cannot, be inferred from such information  For examples of just such studies, see Derks et al 1997;Ozawa et al 2000;Coulson and Kutas 2001;Iwase et al 2002;Mobbs 2003;Moran et al 2004;Watson, Matthews and Allman 2007;McGettigan et al 2015;Chen et al 2017;Chan et al 2018;Hofmann and Rodden 2019. alone. And the temptation to infer more than is warranted from these studies has been a serious obstacle to progress.…”
Section: What's So Funny About Studying Humormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of humor is particularly well-suited to the presentation of sensitive, taboo, and potentially stress-inducing topics, such as sexually transmitted infection. This is because of humor's ability to reduce levels of fear and threat through a process of "emotional shifting from a neutral or negative emotional state to a positive one" (Chan, 2014, in Chen, Chan, Dai, Liao, & Tu, 2017Henley & Donovan, 1999). Furthermore, the use of humor has been shown to be an excellent device for mitigating potential embarrassment (Chapple & Ziebland, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%