2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.24796/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological and psychological mechanisms of the specific and nonspecific effects of acupuncture on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized, controlled, crossover trial

Abstract: Background: Acupuncture, as one of the promising non-pharmacological interventions, has been proved to be beneficial for patients. However, the magnitude of acupuncture’s specific and nonspecific effects, as well as their neurological and psychological determinants, remain unclear. Therefore, this study is designed to examine the acupuncture efficacy, investigate whether the brain mechanisms between the specific and nonspecific effects of acupuncture are different, and to evaluate how psychological factors aff… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mechanism behind it was unelucidated. 20,21 It could also be possible that the effect of sham acupuncture was regression to the mean because we did not have a waiting list control. However, the previous study testing the effect of acupuncture on TTH showed that it was unlikely to be only an effect of regression to the mean, in which participants in the waiting list control group had a response rate of 4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mechanism behind it was unelucidated. 20,21 It could also be possible that the effect of sham acupuncture was regression to the mean because we did not have a waiting list control. However, the previous study testing the effect of acupuncture on TTH showed that it was unlikely to be only an effect of regression to the mean, in which participants in the waiting list control group had a response rate of 4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crossover trial is a good choice in clinical studies because it avoids differences between groups and eliminates differences between individuals, thereby improving the accuracy of efficacy evaluation by evaluating the results in different medical interventions for each patient [29]. Also, the required sample size of a crossover trial is smaller than that of an RCT, which better solves the problem of limited number of subjects and improves the evidence-based medicine evidence for the treatment of CHF with TCM comprehensive intervention [30]. ese will make up the shortcomings of the previous studies and make potential results generalizable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%