2020
DOI: 10.7249/rr2350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological Effects of Repeated Exposure to Military Occupational Levels of Blast: A Review of Scientific Literature

Abstract: Limited Print and Electronic Distribution RightsThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intention of this review was to provide a summary of the literature that had been made publicly available to researchers and medical providers, both within and outside of the DoD, rather than including additional reports that may be limited to only DoD personnel. For further information on such studies (including work currently in progress), interested readers are referred to the summary provided by Simmons et al ( 81 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intention of this review was to provide a summary of the literature that had been made publicly available to researchers and medical providers, both within and outside of the DoD, rather than including additional reports that may be limited to only DoD personnel. For further information on such studies (including work currently in progress), interested readers are referred to the summary provided by Simmons et al ( 81 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To offset this limitation, we intentionally used search terms that were not limited to purely LLB. Unlike other recent reviews of LLB ( 81 , 82 ), our review evaluated the title and abstract of nearly 5,600 articles investigating blast to identify those that were relevant to LLB. Because of the lack of consistency in the terminology used to describe LLB within the scientific community, this was the only way to ensure that all relevant articles were captured in our review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies used tasks that are laboratory versions of what is tested with BrDI, and support the scientific concept underlying the unique nature of this approach ( 52 57 ). Although no previous human studies in military blast have specifically examined this functional measure, a considerable body of work suggests that there is a unique additive value to including tasks that measure cognitive-motor integration in studies of the effects of blast exposure ( 12 , 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do hope that our findings will motivate longitudinal studies that are better suited for isolating the effects of long-term occupational exposure to repeated low-level blast in operators [see Kamimori et al ( 21 )]. Third, because the precise mechanism(s) underlying blast-related neurological injury remains unknown, additional work on that fundamental problem is necessary for gaining a better understanding of the injury pathway ( 12 , 37 ). Fourth, our sample reflects an armed forces population that is mostly male, and as such the findings may not be entirely representative of females ( 63 66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation