Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundDespite appropriate care, most patients do not survive traumatic cardiac arrest, and many survivors suffer from permanent neurological disability. The prevalence of non-dismal neurological outcomes remains unclear.ObjectivesThe aim of the current review is to summarize and assess the quality of reporting of the neurological outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest survivors.Data sourcesA systematic review of Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ProQuest databases was performed from inception of the database to July 2020.Study eligibility criteriaObservational cohort studies that reported neurological outcomes of patients surviving traumatic cardiac arrest were included.Participants and interventionsPatients who were resuscitated following traumatic cardiac arrest.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsThe quality of the included studies was assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) for observational studies.ResultsFrom 4295 retrieved studies, 40 were included (n=23 644 patients). The survival rate was 9.2% (n=2168 patients). Neurological status was primarily assessed at discharge. Overall, 45.8% of the survivors had good or moderate neurological recovery, 29.0% had severe neurological disability or suffered a vegetative state, and 25.2% had missing neurological outcomes. Seventeen studies qualitatively described neurological outcomes based on patient disposition and 23 studies used standardized outcome scales. 28 studies had a serious risk of bias and 12 had moderate risk of bias.LimitationsThe existing literature is characterized by inadequate outcome reporting and a high risk of bias, which limit our ability to prognosticate in this patient population.Conclusions or implications of key findingsGood and moderate neurological recoveries are frequently reported in patients who survive traumatic cardiac arrest. Prospective studies focused on quality of survivorship in traumatic arrest are urgently needed.Level of evidenceSystematic review, level IV.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020198482.

Approach to traumatic cardiac arrest in the emergency department: a narrative literature review for emergency providers

“…[1,2] Despite decades of improvements in modern medical care, the survival rate of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) remains extremely low, ranging from 3.3% to 9.2%. [3][4][5] For those who survive, a large number of people will suffer from debilitating neurological outcomes. [5][6][7] Resource availability and allocation must be considered when deciding to pursue extreme resuscitative measures given the overall poor prognosis after TCA.…”

“…[3][4][5] For those who survive, a large number of people will suffer from debilitating neurological outcomes. [5][6][7] Resource availability and allocation must be considered when deciding to pursue extreme resuscitative measures given the overall poor prognosis after TCA. [8] Among adults, the survival rate is directly influenced by factors including the mechanism of injury and the time between injury and intervention.…”

Seat belt use and cardiac arrest immediately after motor vehicle collision: Nationwide observational study

“…MVCs are important causes of traumatic cardiac arrest, accounting for 50–60 % of all traumatic cardiac arrest cases [ 3 , 4 ]. The survival rate from traumatic cardiac arrest is known to be very poor [ 5 , 6 ], and many of those who survive are known to suffer severe disabilities [ 7 ]. Primary prevention is of paramount importance because of the fatal outcomes of traumatic cardiac arrest.…”