Neuromechanical Assessment of Activated vs. Resting Leg Rigidity Using the Pendulum Test Is Associated With a Fall History in People With Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Leg rigidity is associated with frequent falls in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), suggesting a potential role in functional balance and gait impairments. Changes in the neural state due to secondary tasks, e.g., activation maneuvers, can exacerbate (or “activate”) rigidity, possibly increasing the risk of falls. However, the subjective interpretation and coarse classification of the standard clinical rigidity scale has prohibited the systematic, objective assessment of resting and activated leg rigidity. The pendulum test is an objective diagnostic method that we hypothesized would be sensitive enough to characterize resting and activated leg rigidity. We recorded kinematic data and electromyographic signals from rectus femoris and biceps femoris during the pendulum test in 15 individuals with PD, spanning a range of leg rigidity severity. From the recorded data of leg swing kinematics, we measured biomechanical outcomes including first swing excursion, first extension peak, number and duration of the oscillations, resting angle, relaxation index, maximum and minimum angular velocity. We examined associations between biomechanical outcomes and clinical leg rigidity score. We evaluated the effect of increasing rigidity through activation maneuvers on biomechanical outcomes. Finally, we assessed whether either biomechanical outcomes or changes in outcomes with activation were associated with a fall history. Our results suggest that the biomechanical assessment of the pendulum test can objectively quantify parkinsonian leg rigidity. We found that the presence of high rigidity during clinical exam significantly impacted biomechanical outcomes, i.e., first extension peak, number of oscillations, relaxation index, and maximum angular velocity. No differences in the effect of activation maneuvers between groups with clinically assessed low rigidity were observed, suggesting that activated rigidity may be independent of resting rigidity and should be scored as independent variables. Moreover, we found that fall history was more common among people whose rigidity was increased with a secondary task, as measured by biomechanical outcomes. We conclude that different mechanisms contributing to resting and activated rigidity may play an important yet unexplored functional role in balance impairments. The pendulum test may contribute to a better understanding of fundamental mechanisms underlying motor symptoms in PD, evaluating the efficacy of treatments, and predicting the risk of falls.

Exoskeletons need to react faster than physiological responses to improve standing balance

“…We placed motion capture markers superficial to the body after a custom bilateral Helen Hayes 33-marker set that included the following segments: head-arms-trunk, thigh, shank, and foot. Marker placement was consistent with (19,57), plus four additional markers per foot ankle (medial malleolus, medial and lateral calcaneus, and head of the fifth metatarsal). We filtered ground reaction forces and marker data using fourthorder low-pass filters with cutoffs of 50 and 10 Hz, respectively.…”

Model-based Analysis of Knee Joint Spasticity Based on Pendulum Testing of the Lower Extremities and Independent Component Analysis

“…Various measurement devices have been used to perform quantitative pendulum testing. However, several challenges have been encountered in previous studies, including the inability to eliminate the effects of the initial angle of the knee joint and posture of the trunk when throwing the lower leg into the gravity eld to initiate pendulum movement, which can lead to measurement errors [10,11]. Furthermore, during the experiments, patients are instructed to initiate pendulum movements with the aim of suppressing muscle force generation.…”

“…Furthermore, during the experiments, patients are instructed to initiate pendulum movements with the aim of suppressing muscle force generation. As such, the EMG measurements of both voluntary and involuntary movements must be synchronized using a goniometer when measuring the joint angle, thereby making accurate measurements dif cult [10,11]. EMG measurements require attachment of electrodes to the body surface, and the attachment site has been shown to affect the measurement results as well [3].…”