2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromechanical Control Strategies of Frontal-Plane Angular Momentum of Human Upper Body During Locomotor Transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism was similar to the previously reported control strategy of body COM in the initiation of walking direction change where the trunk was displaced to the opposite of new direction [41]. However, individuals in unanticipated sidestep transitions may easily swing the trailing leg and trunk [40] away from the leading leg direction with increased negative momentum. Thus, in response to unanticipated walking direction change crossover style may require rapid gait termination and inverted-pendulum-style trunk motion to initialize its direction change, while sidestep may take advantage of the momentum during leg swing to be a more effective maneuver for quicker changing of locomotion direction [12].…”
Section: Reactive Control Of Dynamic Balance Is Influenced By Cut Stylesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mechanism was similar to the previously reported control strategy of body COM in the initiation of walking direction change where the trunk was displaced to the opposite of new direction [41]. However, individuals in unanticipated sidestep transitions may easily swing the trailing leg and trunk [40] away from the leading leg direction with increased negative momentum. Thus, in response to unanticipated walking direction change crossover style may require rapid gait termination and inverted-pendulum-style trunk motion to initialize its direction change, while sidestep may take advantage of the momentum during leg swing to be a more effective maneuver for quicker changing of locomotion direction [12].…”
Section: Reactive Control Of Dynamic Balance Is Influenced By Cut Stylesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although these investigations did not compare different cut styles, their results support our findings that anticipatory change of dynamic balance is affected by cut style, but not the direction. Furthermore, these adjustments of whole-body angular momentum may partially result from preparatory control of trunk angular momentum that had the same modification strategy as H [40]. Previous study on sidestep cuts also reported that trunk swing is a strategy assisting in moving body COM toward new walking direction [41].…”
Section: Increased Task Complexity and Unanticipated State Pose Challmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the recovery step, the correlation strength between frontal iWBAM and step width went up for later onset times, though the correlation strengths were weaker than those seen for the perturbed step for earlier perturbation onset times. The weaker correlations across onset times in the recovery step could be due to the participant having ample time to employ other strategies in combination with step placement, such as lateral ankle strategy ( Hof et al, 2010 ) or using arm ( Collins et al, 2009 ; Gholizadeh et al, 2019 ) or torso counter-rotation ( Li and Fey, 2018 ) to induce momentum changes. However, this does not imply that those other strategies are not being used on the perturbed step; on the contrary, lateral ankle strategy is faster acting, as the participant does not have to wait until the subsequent heel contact to employ it ( Reimann et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%