2010
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.034678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromechanical simulation of the locust jump

Abstract: SUMMARYThe neural circuitry and biomechanics of kicking in locusts have been studied to understand their roles in the control of both kicking and jumping. It has been hypothesized that the same neural circuit and biomechanics governed both behaviors but this hypothesis was not testable with current technology. We built a neuromechanical model to test this and to gain a better understanding of the role of the semi-lunar process (SLP) in jump dynamics. The jumping and kicking behaviors of the model were tested b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have demonstrated experimentally that passive joint forces can act in ranges of joint angles where neither active nor passive muscle forces would be effective in generating joint torque. The contributions of passive joint forces, and in particular the consequences of this decoupling from muscle moment arms, have been overlooked in most models of limb joint function, with the exception of [36]. Passive joint forces are likely to be unaffected by the patterns or history of limb muscle activation, or by neuromodulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have demonstrated experimentally that passive joint forces can act in ranges of joint angles where neither active nor passive muscle forces would be effective in generating joint torque. The contributions of passive joint forces, and in particular the consequences of this decoupling from muscle moment arms, have been overlooked in most models of limb joint function, with the exception of [36]. Passive joint forces are likely to be unaffected by the patterns or history of limb muscle activation, or by neuromodulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the data presented here it is not possible to differentiate between the hypotheses stated by Bennet-Clark and by Rothschild about the locking mechanisms for the leg joints. Bennet-Clark hypothesized that the joints were locked by the moment arm of the trochanteral depressor muscle going 'over centre', and thus the resilin 'spring' would act initially as a trochanteral levator [a similar mechanism has been proposed for the claw snap of an alpheid shrimp (Ritzmann, 1974) and for the femoro-tibial joint of the locust hindleg (Cofer et al, 2010)]. Subsequently, activation of another muscle pulls the apodeme over so that the spring acts as a depressor, thus triggering the jump (Bennet-Clark and Lucey, 1967).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This delay may have been caused by relaxation of an internal spring, such as an apodeme. Alternatively, a snap transition in the spring, torque reversal or shifting lever lengths may delay the spring release (Burrows and Morris, 2003;Cofer et al, 2010;Forterre et al, 2005;Holmes and Crosby, 2007;Noh et al, 2012;Ritzmann, 1974). This delay likely provides the necessary time for the flexor muscle to relax and not tear during the rapid outward rotation of the appendage.…”
Section: Control Of Strike Releasementioning
confidence: 99%