2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.11.483972
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromodulation of striatal D1 cells shapes BOLD fluctuations in anatomically connected thalamic and cortical regions

Abstract: Understanding how the brain's macroscale dynamics are shaped by underlying microscale mechanisms is a key problem in neuroscience. In animal models, we can now investigate this relationship in unprecedented detail by directly manipulating cellular-level properties while measuring the whole-brain response using resting-state fMRI. Here we focused on understanding how blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) dynamics, measured within a structurally well-defined striato-thalamo-cortical circuit, are shaped by chemogen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(167 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we find that the dominant dynamic signature of neural activity covaries with the granular cortical layer IV, consistent with the idea that layer IV receives prominent subcortical (including thalamic) feedforward projections [106,107]. Collectively, our findings build on the emerging literature on how heterogeneous micro-architectural properties along with macroscale network embedding (e.g., cortico-cortical connectivity and subcortical projections) jointly shape regional neural dynamics [38][39][40][108][109][110][111].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Finally, we find that the dominant dynamic signature of neural activity covaries with the granular cortical layer IV, consistent with the idea that layer IV receives prominent subcortical (including thalamic) feedforward projections [106,107]. Collectively, our findings build on the emerging literature on how heterogeneous micro-architectural properties along with macroscale network embedding (e.g., cortico-cortical connectivity and subcortical projections) jointly shape regional neural dynamics [38][39][40][108][109][110][111].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Examining dynamics within individual brain regions enables spatial interpretability through visualizing brain-wide maps of classification performance, providing a clear region-by-region picture of activity disruptions. The ability to characterize changes in BOLD dynamics at the level of individual regions has been key to addressing questions about regional differences in the response to spatially targeted brain stimulation [26,90]. It also provides a clearer way to test molecular hypotheses about regional disruption in disorders, which can be compared with rich multimodal region-level atlases spanning morphometry, cortical hierarchy, and multi-omics [34,[91][92][93] to more deeply characterize the physiological underpinnings of disease-relevant changes in future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies that handselect a single feature of interest (like a metric of autocorrelation timescale) [4,5], the large range of alternative features are left untested, leaving open the possibility that alternative statistics could be more informative and interpretable. Applications that have systematically compared the performance across a large feature library, such as hctsa [3,8,17,6,18,19], have involved substantial computational expense and statistical care in dealing with high-dimensional feature spaces (often requiring correction across thousands of features, limiting the power to detect signals in smaller samples). fMRI time series are short, noisy, and-particularly in the restingstate regime where dynamics may be approximated as close to a steady-state-are generally well-suited to being characterized by linear time-series analysis methods [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%