“…To date, optoelectronic devices have successfully replicated important functions of biological synapses, including excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC)/inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC), short-term plasticity (STP)/long-term plasticity (LTP), and so on. – However, many of the reported artificial synapses are based on fragile inorganic materials, which generally require complex and expensive preparation methods and are unlikely to work well for large-scale and flexible optoelectronic synaptic devices. – , On the other hand, the quick development of wearable electronics puts a strong demand on flexible computing systems. Thus, great efforts have been made to explore flexible organic materials for synaptic devices. – Until now, a variety of organic materials have been successfully utilized for the fabrication of optoelectronic synapses, such as chitosan, chlorophyll, copper(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc), , pentacene, poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), , and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate (PEDOT:PSS). , However, in most cases, these devices were constructed on rigid substrates, failing to fully exploit the flexible nature of these organic materials. ,– …”