2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromuscular effects of venoms and crotoxin-like proteins from Crotalus durissus ruruima and Crotalus durissus cumanensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The caseinolytic activity of the yellow venom of C. d. ruruima is three-fold higher than the white venom of C. d. terrificus or C. d. ruruima . On the other hand, Cavalcante and Ponce-Soto (2015) showed that the venom of C. d. ruruima and C. d. . cumanensis displays neurotoxic activity due to crotoxin activity, and crotoxin from C. d. cumanensis was more potent than that from C. d. ruruima venom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The caseinolytic activity of the yellow venom of C. d. ruruima is three-fold higher than the white venom of C. d. terrificus or C. d. ruruima . On the other hand, Cavalcante and Ponce-Soto (2015) showed that the venom of C. d. ruruima and C. d. . cumanensis displays neurotoxic activity due to crotoxin activity, and crotoxin from C. d. cumanensis was more potent than that from C. d. ruruima venom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, crotoxin, a neurotoxic phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ), is the main toxin of C. durissus venom and accounts for 70–90% of its venom proteome [610]. On the other hand, significant variation has been observed for crotamine at both individual and population levels, since it accounts from 2 up to 22% of C. durissus proteome [9, 1113].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other Crotalus ssp. from adjacent geographical location, such as C. d. ruruima and C. d. cumanensis, have similar venom compositions, showing both hemorrhagic and neurotoxic activities (Aguilar et al, 2007;Calvete et al, 2010;Cavalcante et al, 2015;Dos Santos et al, 1993). Thus, there must be some positive evolutionary pressure to favor this phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although type II appears to be more abundant in South America, while the type I in northern and central part of the continent, exceptions were described. South American exceptions to this classification are Crotalus durissus ruruima (Dos Santos et al, 1993), C. d. cumanensis (Cavalcante et al, 2015;Yoshida-Kanashiro et al, 2003) and Crotalus vegrandis (Gir on et al, 2005), whose venoms display both hemorrhagic and neurotoxic activities. North and Central American exception are the species Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus (Massey et al, 2012), Crotalus viridis/oreganus complex (Mackessy, 2010), Crotalus horridus (Glenn et al, 1994), Crotalus simus (Castro et al, 2013) and Crotalus tigris .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%