Neuromuscular ultrasound: Impact on diagnosis and management

Abstract

Introduction/AimHigh‐resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is increasingly used in evaluating neuromuscular conditions. Its potential advantages include its ability to discern anatomic information and make specific etiological diagnoses. Although many studies have demonstrated HRUS effectiveness, especially in mononeuropathies, more information is needed to better determine how often and to what extent useful information is obtained; how it influences diagnosis, clinical decision‐making, and patient management; and how it is used with electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on patients referred for HRUS at a university laboratory during 2021. Demographic information, referral diagnoses, clinical information, HRUS findings, and follow‐up patient management were analyzed. For patients who had EDx, results were compared with HRUS. Determinations were made whether HRUS did or did not aid in the diagnosis. For patients in whom HRUS resulted in a diagnosis, determination was made whether it confirmed the diagnosis made clinically or by EDx but did not change management; added additional important information; and/or made a decisive impact on subsequent management.ResultsFive hundred two patients were analyzed, most referred for mononeuropathy, brachial plexopathy, and polyneuropathy. HRUS was abnormal in 81.7% of patients. HRUS added additional useful information in 79.0% and was decisive in management in 62.7%. In patients who also had abnormal EDx, HRUS resulted in decisive management in 49.5%.DiscussionHRUS is an effective diagnostic tool that frequently adds localizing and structural information that is otherwise not obtainable by clinical and EDx evaluation. In a substantial number of patients selected for HRUS, it is decisive in guiding further management.