2019
DOI: 10.17816/jowd68129-36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuron-specific enolase and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in umbilical cord blood in full-term newborns with intrauterine growth retardation

Abstract: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in umbilical cord blood in full-term newborns with asymmetrical intrauterine growth retardation resulted from chronic placental insufficiency have been studied. Not only a 2.0–2.5-fold increase in the blood NSE level, but also a reduction in BDNF levels were observed, indicating brain damage combined with the lack of adequate compensatory capabilities. With an increase in the duration of intrauterine fetal development under condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These would have also been excluded for other reasons such as not meeting FGR definition (very low birth weight, preterm birth only), not assessing neurodevelopmental outcomes, or that no blood biomarkers were assessed. One study was excluded as it did not include neurodevelopmental assessments (36) and another was excluded as it reported only the presence of brain injury for the FGR cohort (37). Finally, one study was a twin study but was excluded as it did not separate the FGR twins from the normally grown pair for comparison (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These would have also been excluded for other reasons such as not meeting FGR definition (very low birth weight, preterm birth only), not assessing neurodevelopmental outcomes, or that no blood biomarkers were assessed. One study was excluded as it did not include neurodevelopmental assessments (36) and another was excluded as it reported only the presence of brain injury for the FGR cohort (37). Finally, one study was a twin study but was excluded as it did not separate the FGR twins from the normally grown pair for comparison (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small for gestational age (SGA) differs from FGR in that it is solely defined by birthweight <10th percentile (3)(4)(5). We observed, however, that the studies included for full text review that included SGA cohorts either did not have a cohort of NG infants as controls or did not conduct a neurodevelopmental assessment >12 months of age for the NG cohort (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). Therefore, even when broadening the inclusion criteria to include SGA infants, our search of the current literature still only yielded one study that met all inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%