2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-020-03283-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal Biomarkers in Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Term Babies with Perinatal Asphyxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported improved motor development in children submitted to hypothermia compared with children in the normothermia group at 18 months of life, corroborating our results. These results may explain the positive outcomes of development in our study since both newborns improved their behaviors throughout the assessments (14). The authors reported improved motor development in children submitted to hypothermia compared with children in the normothermia group at 18 months old, corroborating our results (14).…”
Section: -34°c 33°csupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The authors reported improved motor development in children submitted to hypothermia compared with children in the normothermia group at 18 months of life, corroborating our results. These results may explain the positive outcomes of development in our study since both newborns improved their behaviors throughout the assessments (14). The authors reported improved motor development in children submitted to hypothermia compared with children in the normothermia group at 18 months old, corroborating our results (14).…”
Section: -34°c 33°csupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Catherine et al [24] evaluated whether serum levels of neuronal biomarkers correlated to neurodevelopmental outcomes in term neonates at 18 months who hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia. They showed that serum neuronal biomarkers, S100B, and NSE levels were not correlated to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in that population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest of these was a clinical trial from China involving 194 neonates [ 55 ], but this trial has been heavily criticized for protocol violations, post-randomisation exclusion and poor follow-up rates. Six of these cooling trials were from the same hospital, but with mortality in the usual care arm varying between 7 % and 50 %, raising concerns about data credibility and duplicate publications [ [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] ]. Hence, although the pooled data from these trials show a reduction in mortality with cooling, such a meta-analysis has no scientific value [ 62 , 63 ] ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%