In the forty years since the Society for Neuroscience was founded, our understanding of the biology of memory has progressed dramatically. From a historical perspective, one can discern four distinct periods of growth in neurobiological research during that time. Here I use that chronology to chart a personalized and selective course through forty years of extraordinary advances in our understanding of the biology of memory storage.Emergence of a cell biology of memory-related synaptic plasticity By 1969, we had already learned from the pioneering work of Brenda Milner that certain forms of memory were stored in the hippocampus and the medial temporal lobe. In addition, the work of Larry Squire revealed that there are two major memory systems in the brain: declarative (explicit) and procedural (implicit or nondeclarative). Declarative memory, a memory for facts and events-for people, places, and objects-requires the medial temporal lobe and the hippocampus (Scoville and Milner, 1957;Squire, 1992;Schacter and Tulving, 1994). In contrast, we knew less about procedural memory, a memory for perceptual and motor skills and other forms of nondeclarative memory that proved to involve not one but a number of brain systems: the cerebellum, the striatum, the amygdala, and in the most elementary instances, simple reflex pathways themselves. Moreover, we knew even less about the mechanisms of any form of memory storage; we did not even know whether the storage mechanisms were synaptic or nonsynaptic.In 1968, Alden Spencer and I were invited to write a perspective for Physiological Reviews, which we entitled "Cellular Neurophysiological Approaches in the Study of Learning." In it we pointed out that there was no frame of reference for studying memory because we could not yet distinguish between the two conflicting approaches to the biology of memory that had been advanced: the aggregate field approach advocated by Karl Lashley in the 1950s and Ross Adey in the 1960s, which assumed that information is stored in the bioelectric field generated by the aggregate activity of many neurons; and the cellular connectionist approach, which derived from Santiago Ramon y Cajal's idea (1894) that learning results from changes in the strength of the synapse. This idea was later renamed synaptic plasticity by Kornorski and incorporated into more refined models of learning by Hebb. We concluded our perspective by emphasizing the need to develop behavioral systems in which one could distinguish between these alternatives by relating, in a causal way, specific changes in the neuronal components of a behavior to modification of that behavior during learning and memory storage (Kandel and Spencer, 1968).
Procedural memoryThe first behavioral systems to be analyzed in this manner were simple forms of learning in the context of procedural memory. From 1969 to 1979, several useful model systems emerged: the flexion reflex of cats, the eye-blink response of rabbits, and a variety of invertebrate systems: the gill-withdrawal reflex of Aplysia, olfac...