2002
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.10374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal differentiation of stem cells isolated from adult muscle

Abstract: Lineage uncommitted pluripotent stem cells reside in the connective tissue of skeletal muscle. The present study was carried out with pluripotent stem cells (PPSCs) isolated from 6‐month old rat muscle. Before differentiation, these cells were vimentin+, CD90+, CD45−, and varied in their expression of CD34. The PPSCs were expanded as non‐adherent aggregates under similar conditions to those used to generate neurospheres from embryonic or neural stem cells. The PPSC‐derived neurospheres were positive for nestin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The myoblasts in these clones can divide for more than 25 passages with preserving their myogenic specificity because the myoblasts randomly selected from 3 to 25 passages were uniformly positive for MyoD, the key marker of myogenic lineagecommitted myoblasts (Kablar et al, 1999;Parker et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004); while grown in DM to induce myogenic differentiation, they can form multinucleated myotubes stained positive for Myosin, a marker of myogenic terminal differentiation myotubes (Gal-Levi et al, 1998;Odelberg et al, 2000;Langley et al, 2002). The data shown in Figure 1 let us exclude the possibility that multiple distinct stem/progenitor cells identified in adult skeletal muscle present in the myoblast clones: first, although muscle satellite cells, the precursor cells of myoblasts, may express Myf5, the expression of MyoD is not detectable in the cells (Jennifer et al, 2003); second, because the myoblast clones are uniformly negative for Nestin, CD34, and CD45, there are no such heterogeneous contamination cells as previously identified Nestin ϩ NSCs (Romero-Ramos et al, 2002), CD34 ϩ /CD45 ϩ HSCs (Jackson et al, 1999), CD45 ϩ SP cells (Asakura et al, 2002), and CD34 ϩ MDSCs (Qu-Petersen et al, 2002) in adult skeletal muscle; in addition, there is also not the presence of fibroblasts and MSCs because they do not differentiate to form multinucleated myotubes expressing Myosin when grown under the same DM conditions to the myoblasts; finally, these possible heterogeneous cells in the adult skeletal muscle never express myogenic specific protein MyoD. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence against the interpretation that the myoblast culture system contains multiple distinct cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The myoblasts in these clones can divide for more than 25 passages with preserving their myogenic specificity because the myoblasts randomly selected from 3 to 25 passages were uniformly positive for MyoD, the key marker of myogenic lineagecommitted myoblasts (Kablar et al, 1999;Parker et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004); while grown in DM to induce myogenic differentiation, they can form multinucleated myotubes stained positive for Myosin, a marker of myogenic terminal differentiation myotubes (Gal-Levi et al, 1998;Odelberg et al, 2000;Langley et al, 2002). The data shown in Figure 1 let us exclude the possibility that multiple distinct stem/progenitor cells identified in adult skeletal muscle present in the myoblast clones: first, although muscle satellite cells, the precursor cells of myoblasts, may express Myf5, the expression of MyoD is not detectable in the cells (Jennifer et al, 2003); second, because the myoblast clones are uniformly negative for Nestin, CD34, and CD45, there are no such heterogeneous contamination cells as previously identified Nestin ϩ NSCs (Romero-Ramos et al, 2002), CD34 ϩ /CD45 ϩ HSCs (Jackson et al, 1999), CD45 ϩ SP cells (Asakura et al, 2002), and CD34 ϩ MDSCs (Qu-Petersen et al, 2002) in adult skeletal muscle; in addition, there is also not the presence of fibroblasts and MSCs because they do not differentiate to form multinucleated myotubes expressing Myosin when grown under the same DM conditions to the myoblasts; finally, these possible heterogeneous cells in the adult skeletal muscle never express myogenic specific protein MyoD. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence against the interpretation that the myoblast culture system contains multiple distinct cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To exclude the presence of fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the myoblast clones, NIH3T3 and human MSCs were also cultured in the same myoblast GM or DM to determine the myogenic specificity of these cells. Furthermore, the Nestin ϩ NSCs (neural stem cells) and CD45 ϩ /CD34 ϩ HSCs (hemopoietic stem cells), which were used as the positive control of the immunocytochemical analysis with anti-Nestin, anti-CD34, and anti-CD45 antibodies to exclude the presence of previously reported progenitor/stem cells isolated from adult skeletal muscle, such as Nestin ϩ neuronal differentiation of stem cells (Romero-Ramos et al, 2002), and CD45 ϩ /CD34 ϩ SP cells/MDSCs (Asakura et al, 2002;Jankowski et al, 2002;Qu-Petersen et al, 2002;Tamaki et al, 2003) were plated onto the collagen-coated glass coverslips for 12 h to adhere. The control human MSCs and HSCs were gifts from Professor XiaoDan Guo and Xiaoxia Jiang, Ph.D., whereas NSCs of adult rat were isolated as previously described (Xu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Myoblast Isolation and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another distinct population of bone marrow-derived stem cells can differentiate to cells of various lineages including muscle, endothelial, epithelial and neural cells (Yoon et al, 2005). Other adult stem cells that can be induced to differentiate to a different cell type, include skeletal muscle stem cells to blood cells (Jackson et al, 1999;Cao et al, 2003) and neural cells (Romero-Ramos et al, 2002); cardiac muscle stem cells to endothelial cells (Mohri et al, 2006); neural stem cells to blood and endothelial cells (Bjornson et al, 1999;Wurmser et al, 2004); hair follicle stem cells to neural lineage cells (Amoh et al, 2005a, b); and testis-derived stem cells to a wide variety of cell types (KanatsuShinohara et al, 2004;Guan et al, 2006). The use of adult stem cells has thus considerable therapeutic potential for the regeneration of damaged tissues.…”
Section: Epigenetic Control Of Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%