2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation Induces Long-Lasting and Reversible Effects on Oculomotor Performance in Non-human Primates

Abstract: Since the late 2010s, Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) has been used experimentally to carryout safe, non-invasive stimulation of the brain with better spatial resolution than Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS). This innovative stimulation method has emerged as a novel and valuable device for studying brain function in humans and animals. In particular, single pulses of TUS directed to oculomotor regions have been shown to modulate visuomotor behavior of non-human primates during 100 ms ultrasoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, ultrasound-mediated suppression of somatosensory evoked potentials peaked 5 min post-stimulation and returned to baseline within 20 min [25]. Similarly, ultrasound-mediated modulation of oculomotor behaviour was reversed within 18e31 min of stimulation [26]. These differences in temporal characteristics may be due to differences in stimulation parameters or brain regions targeted, and the fact that in vivo target regions are stimulated in a focally restricted manner, whereas our entire culture is stimulated simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, ultrasound-mediated suppression of somatosensory evoked potentials peaked 5 min post-stimulation and returned to baseline within 20 min [25]. Similarly, ultrasound-mediated modulation of oculomotor behaviour was reversed within 18e31 min of stimulation [26]. These differences in temporal characteristics may be due to differences in stimulation parameters or brain regions targeted, and the fact that in vivo target regions are stimulated in a focally restricted manner, whereas our entire culture is stimulated simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In comparison with other NIBS, however, the main advantages of FUS are its better spatial resolution and the possibility of reaching brain targets that are over several centimeters in depth from the scalp. Finally, FUS is a nonionizing technique that is relatively simple and inexpensive to implement (Elias et al, 2013;Pouget et al, 2020;Tufail et al, 2011). A basic FUS experimental setup for NHP consists of a single element ceramic transducer.…”
Section: Focused Ultrasound Stimulation and Neuroimagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the medial frontal cortex, the somatosensory cortex, the amygdala, or the striatum) and distant regions (Folloni et al, 2019;Khalighinejad et al, 2020;Verhagen et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2018) (Figure 8B). When stimulation bursts are repeated over up to a 40 s period, neuromodulatory effects are observed offline for durations of 10 to 90 minutes (Dallapiazza et al, 2018;Folloni et al, 2019;Khalighinejad et al, 2020;Pouget et al, 2020;Verhagen et al, 2019). In vitro results suggest that TUS effects could even last for up to 8-14 hours (Clennell et al, 2021).…”
Section: Applications Of Fus For Behavioral and Neural Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a control region, we stimulated the ACC which is involved in the extended social brain. The impact of TUS on FEF and ACC and their consequence on behavior have already been demonstrated 41,[52][53][54] . We also collected control data for which no stimulation was performed (note that these are the data used in the replication).…”
Section: Replication and Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To assess if attentional or oculomotor related neural activity could explain the modulation by social prediction in the SPA, we performed Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) on the same macaques used for the replication just prior to the fMRI free-viewing task. We stimulated the Frontal Eye Field (FEF) as it is involved in attention and oculomotor movement such as saccades 52,53 , and was also revealed in our social prediction analysis. As a control region, we stimulated the ACC which is involved in the extended social brain.…”
Section: Replication and Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%