2020
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropathological correlates of cortical superficial siderosis in cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Abstract: Cortical superficial siderosis is an established haemorrhagic neuroimaging marker of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. In fact, cortical superficial siderosis is emerging as a strong independent risk factor for future lobar intracerebral haemorrhage. However, the underlying neuropathological correlates and pathophysiological mechanisms of cortical superficial siderosis remain elusive. Here we use an in vivo MRI, ex vivo MRI, histopathology approach to assess the neuropathological correlates and vascular pathology u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that 18 F-THK5351 accumulates in lesions where astrogliosis occurs and that 18 F-THK5351 PET can be an imaging modality to visualize and quantify astrogliosis, as recently demonstrated in patients with a cerebral infarction or neurological disorders ( 49 51 ). In our case, 18 F-THK5351 retentions were observed in some, but not all, regions with cSS, presumably because this effect might depend on severity of cSS and the degree of astrogliosis that is correlated with the extent of hemosiderin deposition ( 52 ). 18 F-THK5351 retentions were observed only in some areas rather than all peripheral regions at the lobar hemorrhage in this patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…These findings suggest that 18 F-THK5351 accumulates in lesions where astrogliosis occurs and that 18 F-THK5351 PET can be an imaging modality to visualize and quantify astrogliosis, as recently demonstrated in patients with a cerebral infarction or neurological disorders ( 49 51 ). In our case, 18 F-THK5351 retentions were observed in some, but not all, regions with cSS, presumably because this effect might depend on severity of cSS and the degree of astrogliosis that is correlated with the extent of hemosiderin deposition ( 52 ). 18 F-THK5351 retentions were observed only in some areas rather than all peripheral regions at the lobar hemorrhage in this patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This result was in line with those of a recent cSS study. 24 However, some unique findings were revealed in our patient. A bilinear track-like appearance of the cSS on the ex vivo MRI was compatible with iron deposition on the pia matter and within cortical layers II–III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The reliability of the Aβ and iron models were assessed by comparing the AI-assisted quantitative measures (percentage area of cortical and leptomeningeal CAA, percentage area of cortical parenchymal Aβ-plaques, and density of cortical iron positive cells) with previously obtained semiquantitative scores [ 10 , 31 ]. For this purpose, a subset of 68 sections were used, derived from a total number of 17 CAA and non-CAA cases (7 females, 10 males; mean age at death [standard deviation] 76.53 [10.10] years) from the MGH cohort (see [ 11 ] for more details). These sections included standard sampled areas from the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other histopathological observations, such as iron deposition (indicative of hemorrhage and siderosis) [ 7 , 9 ], reactive astrocytes and microglia (indicative of neuroinflammation) [ 19 ], and fibrin accumulation in the walls of small vessels and surrounding cells (indicative of blood–brain-barrier [BBB] leakage) [ 12 , 16 ] are also crucial to understand complex disease mechanisms. These markers have so far mainly been quantified using visual semiquantitative scores [ 11 ] or manual count [ 15 , 32 ]. Even when the scores are well-defined and their reliability assessed by inter-rating [ 32 ], they remain subjective and time-consuming to standardize across centers [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%