2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological changes of brain and spinal cord in individuals with patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Abstract: IntroductionReduced neuromuscular control due to altered neurophysiological functions of the central nervous system has been suggested to cause movement deficits in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, the underlying neurophysiological measures of brain and spinal cord in this population remain to be poorly understood. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for altered cortical and spinal cord functions in individuals with PFP.Methods and analysisThe protocol for cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protocol for conducting the review was prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines (PRISMA-P) (Shamseer et al, 2015), and has previously been peer-reviewed and published (Liang et al, 2021). Additionally, this systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration number: CRD42020212128).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol for conducting the review was prepared using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines (PRISMA-P) (Shamseer et al, 2015), and has previously been peer-reviewed and published (Liang et al, 2021). Additionally, this systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (Registration number: CRD42020212128).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%