2018
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological Comparison Among Tonic, High Frequency, and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Novel Insights Into Spinal and Brain Mechanisms of Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies ( n = 3) have also selectively examined the effects of SCS on evoked electrical potentials recorded via intracerebral electrodes in the thalamus and found similar evidence, suggesting that SCS modifies evoked responses to innocuous and painful peripheral nerve stimulation at the thalamic level . Two additional studies used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the effects of SCS on cortical excitability in patients with neuropathic pain and found that SCS was able to efficiently modulate cortical excitability . In one study, SCS was shown to decrease cortical excitability in patients (with lumbosacral root injury syndrome), primarily indicated by a reduction of intracortical facilitation that was paralleled by a decrease in self‐reported pain experience .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A few studies ( n = 3) have also selectively examined the effects of SCS on evoked electrical potentials recorded via intracerebral electrodes in the thalamus and found similar evidence, suggesting that SCS modifies evoked responses to innocuous and painful peripheral nerve stimulation at the thalamic level . Two additional studies used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the effects of SCS on cortical excitability in patients with neuropathic pain and found that SCS was able to efficiently modulate cortical excitability . In one study, SCS was shown to decrease cortical excitability in patients (with lumbosacral root injury syndrome), primarily indicated by a reduction of intracortical facilitation that was paralleled by a decrease in self‐reported pain experience .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among the 67 studies included in this review, 24 used neurophysiological measures (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59), 14 used functional neuroimaging techniques (12,(33)(34)(35)(36)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68), 3 used a combination of neurophysiological and functional neuroimaging techniques (69-71), 14 used quantitative sensory testing (37)(38)(39)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78)(79)(80)…”
Section: Classification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This kind of LEP response is in line with a previous study that focused on tonic SCS . Conversely, a recent study has reported decreases in N2–P2 amplitudes in patients with low back pain under tonic, high frequency, and burst SCS , although no significant correlation with pain intensity was found. No study to date has assessed LEPs in patients under DRGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%